Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

被引:0
作者
Tod B. Sloan
Paul Mongan
Clark Lyda
Antoun Koht
机构
[1] University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine,Department of Anesthesiology
[2] University of Colorado Health,Departments of Anesthesiology, Neurosurgery, and Neurology
[3] Northwestern University,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2014年 / 28卷
关键词
Propofol; Lidocaine; Total intravenous anesthesia; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Motor evoked potentials; Spinal surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioids is frequently utilized for spinal surgery where somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) are monitored. Lidocaine infusions can contribute to antinociception and unconsciousness, thus allowing for a reduction in the total dose of propofol. We examined our recent experience with lidocaine infusions to quantify this effect. After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of propofol usage in propofol-opioid TIVA (with and without lidocaine) for spine cases monitored with SSEP and tcMEP over a 7 months period. The propofol infusion rate, cortical amplitudes of the SSEP (median nerve, posterior tibial nerve), amplitudes and stimulation voltage of the tcMEP (adductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior) were evaluated. The savings of propofol and sufentanil were estimated based on utilization in 50 milliliter (ml) bottles and 5 ml ampules, respectively. 129 cases were evaluated. Propofol infusion rates were reduced with lidocaine infusion from an average of 115–99 μg/kg/min (p = 0.00038) and sufentanil infusions from an average of 0.36–0.29 μg/kg/h (p = 0.0059). This reduction in propofol infusion was also seen when the cases were divided into anterior cervical, posterior cervical, or posterior thoraco-lumbar procedures. No significant differences in the cortical SSEP or tcMEP amplitudes or the tcMEP stimulation voltages used were observed. No complications were associated with the use of the lidocaine infusion. The total estimated drug savings included 104 50 ml bottles of propofol and 5 5 ml ampules of sufentanil. These cases indicate that a lidocaine infusion can be effectively utilized in spine surgery with SSEP and tcMEP monitoring as a means to reduce propofol and sufentanil usage without a negative effect on the monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 147
页数:8
相关论文
共 261 条
  • [1] Phillips OC(1960)Intravenous lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia: a clinical evaluation Anesth Analg 39 317-322
  • [2] Lyons WB(1958)Intravenous lignocaine anaesthesia Anaesthesia 13 138-146
  • [3] Harris LC(1969)Intravenous lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia for endoscopy Anesth Analg 48 224-227
  • [4] Nelson AT(2012)Perioperative intravenous lidocaine decreases the incidence of persistent pain after breast surgery Clin J Pain 28 567-572
  • [5] Graff TD(2012)Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Dis Colon Rectum 55 1183-1194
  • [6] Frazier TM(2012)Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine reduces hospital length of stay following open gastrectomy for stomach cancer in men J Clin Anesth 24 465-470
  • [7] De Clive-Lowe SG(2012)Systemic lidocaine to improve postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery Anesth Analg 115 262-267
  • [8] Desmond J(1981)Current concepts of the mechanism of action of local anesthetics J Dent Res 60 1460-1470
  • [9] North J(2007)Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy Anesthesiology 106 11-8
  • [10] Blancato LS(2006)Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and i.v. infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery Br J Anaesth 97 640-646