California Essentials for Childhood Case Study: Collective Impact Through Strategic Opportunities

被引:0
作者
Abbott M. [1 ,2 ]
Wirtz S. [3 ]
机构
[1] California Epidemiologic Investigation Service (Cal-EIS), California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Sacramento, CA
[2] University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
[3] Injury Surveillance and Epidemiology Section, Safe and Active Community Branch, CDPH, PO Box 997377, Sacramento, 95899, CA
关键词
Child abuse; Child maltreatment; Child neglect; Collective impact; Policy; Prevention; Social norms; Systems change;
D O I
10.1007/s42448-018-0012-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This case study describes the formation, process, and implementation of the California Essentials for Childhood (EfC) Initiative. Major successes and challenges of the EfC Initiative are highlighted, as well as lessons learned and future directions. Grounded in a collective impact organizing model, the EfC Initiative brought a public health lens to addressing child maltreatment in California with an emphasis on primary prevention and social determinants of health. The public health perspective allows for broader policy and systems change approaches that can have population-level impacts. This perspective was embraced by partner organizations in ways that will have lasting influence and help to align cross-sector efforts to promote safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments. The EfC Initiative was also successful in developing new Childhood Adversity and Resilience metrics for Kidsdata.org and local dashboards that provide actionable data for local partners. However, it was challenging to operate under a collective impact structure in a state as geographically and demographically diverse as California. The lessons learned will inform the next steps for the EfC Initiative. © 2019, This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 152
页数:19
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Anda R.F., Brown D.W., Dube S.R., Bremner J.D., Felitti V.J., Giles W.H., Adverse childhood experiences and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 5, pp. 396-403, (2008)
[2]  
Bohn S., Danielson C., Fisher J., Kimberlin S., Mattingly M., Wimer C., The California Poverty Measure, 2014, (2017)
[3]  
Brown D.W., Young K.E., Anda R.F., Felitti V.J., Giles W.H., Re: asthma and the risk of lung cancer. Findings from the adverse childhood experiences (ACE), Cancer Causes & Control, 17, 3, pp. 349-350, (2006)
[4]  
Enacted budget detail, (2015)
[5]  
Adverse Childhood Experiences (Aces): California Update, 2011–2013 Data, (2016)
[6]  
Epicenter - California Injury Data Online, (2018)
[7]  
Strengthening families: A protective factors framework, (2018)
[8]  
(2018)
[9]  
Coleman-Jensen A., Gregory C., Singh A., Household food security in the United States in 2013, (2014)
[10]  
Felitti V.J., Anda R.F., Nordenberg D., Williamson D.F., Spitz A.M., Edwards V., Marks J.S., Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14, 4, pp. 245-258, (1998)