Identifying indicators of university autonomy according to stakeholders’ interests

被引:0
作者
Seungchan Choi
机构
[1] Pusan National University,
来源
Tertiary Education and Management | 2019年 / 25卷
关键词
University autonomy; Academic freedom; University accountability; Stakeholders; Indicators;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper is an attempt to reconcile two different perspectives and come up with a more comprehensive conceptualization of university autonomy by adopting a stakeholder approach in identifying indicators of university autonomy. One perspective views university autonomy as a protection of academic freedom and the other as a performance enhancer. In order to secure public support for university autonomy, a strategy to satisfy both perspectives is required. A stakeholder approach helps identifying stakeholder interests which leads to an analysis of what is expected in return for university autonomy. University autonomy indicators developed out of these interests would facilitate a measure to evaluate and secure academic freedom and institutional autonomy in a way that secures better support for university autonomy from higher education stakeholders. This paper examines existing literature to identify higher education stakeholders and their interests and comes up with an example of autonomy indicators that reflect these interests.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 29
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Aghion P(2008)Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation RAND Journal of Economics (Wiley-Blackwell) 39 617-635
  • [2] Dewatripont M(2010)A relationship approach to higher education institution stakeholder management Tertiary Education and Management 16 159-181
  • [3] Stein JC(2006)Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US European Journal of Education 41 245-267
  • [4] Alves H(2014)Individual academic freedom: An ordinary concern of the first amendment Mississippi Law Journal 83 677-743
  • [5] Mainardes EW(2016)'Measuring' the erosion of academic freedom as an international human right: A report on the legal protection of academic freedom in Europe Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 49 597-691
  • [6] Raposo M(2009)Critique, dissent, disciplinarity Critical Inquiry 35 773-795
  • [7] Ash MG(2015)Academic freedom for the next 100 years : Social value of academic freedom defended Indiana Law Journal 91 5-16
  • [8] Bauries SR(2008)New public management in Korean higher education: Is it reality or another fad? Asia Pacific Education Review 9 190-205
  • [9] Beiter KD(2011)University governance reforms: Potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education 62 503-517
  • [10] Karran T(2012)Global ideas and modern public sector reforms: A theoretical elaboration and empirical discussion of a neoinstitutional theory American Review of Public Administration 42 635-653