Regional flood frequency analysis using complex networks

被引:0
作者
T. K. Drissia
V. Jothiprakash
Bellie Sivakumar
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Centre for Water Resources Development and Management,undefined
来源
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2022年 / 36卷
关键词
Regional flood frequency analysis; Streamflow; Complex networks; Degree centrality; Clustering coefficient; Correlation threshold; India;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Proper regionalisation (identification of homogeneous regions) is key to reliable regional flood frequency analysis. Several methods have been proposed in the literature for regionalisation, including the method of residuals, L-moment method, and fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. The present study explores the suitability of the theory of complex networks for regionalisation of watersheds, with an aim to perform regional flood frequency analysis. The west-flowing rivers of Kerala in India are considered for this study. Two complex networks-based methods, namely degree centrality and clustering coefficient, are applied for regionalisation, and daily streamflow data are analysed. To identify possible links between streamflow gauging stations, different correlation threshold values (i.e. linear correlations in streamflow between stations) are used. Two approaches are adopted in the use of correlation threshold values: the first (Method I) with threshold as mean, median, and mode of correlation values; and the second (Method II) with arbitrary threshold values. The regionalisation results suggest that Method II yields better results, both with degree centrality and clustering coefficient. Based on Method II, the use of degree centrality results in seven regions (five homogeneous and two heterogeneous) and clustering coefficient results in eight regions (seven homogeneous and one heterogeneous). Comparison of predicted and observed flood quantiles indicates that the degree centrality-based regionalisation yields R2 values in the range 0.94–0.86 for return periods 2, 5, 20, 50, and 100 years, whereas the clustering coefficient-based regionalisation yields R2 values in the range 0.98–0.91. The results from this present study suggest that complex network theory is a suitable alternative for identifying homogeneous regions for regional flood frequency analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 135
页数:20
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Albert R(1999)Internet diameter of World Wide Web Nature 401 398-399
[2]  
Jeong H(1999)Emergence of scaling in random networks Science 286 509-512
[3]  
Barabasi A-L(2014)Regional flood frequency analysis using kernel-based fuzzy clustering approach Water Resour Res 50 3295-3316
[4]  
Barabási A-L(1990)Comparison of method of residuals and cluster analysis for flood regionalization J Water Resour Plan Manag 115 793-808
[5]  
Albert R(2013)Complex networks identify spatial patterns of extreme rainfall events of the South American Monsoon System Geophys Res Lett 40 4386-4392
[6]  
Basu B(2016)Characterization of river flow fluctuations via horizontal visibility graphs Phys A 444 1003-1011
[7]  
Srinivas V(1990)Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach Water Resour Res 26 2257-2265
[8]  
Bhaskar NR(2000)The formation of groups for regional flood frequency analysis Hydrol Sci J 45 97-112
[9]  
O’Connor CA(1857)On the theory of the analytical forms called trees Philos Mag 13 172-176
[10]  
Boers N(1988)Methods and merits of regional flood frequency analysis J Hydrol 100 269-290