Association of the infection probability of COVID-19 with ventilation rates in confined spaces

被引:0
作者
Hui Dai
Bin Zhao
机构
[1] Tsinghua University,Department of Building Science, School of Architecture
[2] Tsinghua University,Beijing Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Quality Evaluation and Control
来源
Building Simulation | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; ventilation; infection probability; Wells-Riley equation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A growing number of cases have proved the possibility of airborne transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ensuring an adequate ventilation rate is essential to reduce the risk of infection in confined spaces. In this study, we estimated the association between the infection probability and ventilation rates with the Wells-Riley equation, where the quantum generation rate (q) by a COVID-19 infector was obtained using a reproductive number-based fitting approach. The estimated q value of COVID-19 is 14–48 h−1. To ensure an infection probability of less than 1%, a ventilation rate larger than common values (100–350 m3/h per infector and 1200–4000 m3/h per infector for 0.25 h and 3 h of exposure, respectively) is required. If the infector and susceptible person wear masks, then the ventilation rate ensuring a less than 1% infection probability can be reduced to a quarter respectively, which is easier to achieve by the normal ventilation mode applied in typical scenarios, including offices, classrooms, buses, and aircraft cabins. Strict preventive measures (e.g., wearing masks and preventing asymptomatic infectors from entering public spaces using tests) that have been widely adopted should be effective in reducing the risk of infection in confined spaces.
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1327
页数:6
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Anfinrud P(2020)Visualizing speechgenerated oral fluid droplets with laser light scattering New England Journal of Medicine 382 2061-2063
  • [2] Stadnytskyi V(2020)Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment Environment International 141 105794-59
  • [3] Bax CE(2020)Assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 basic reproduction number, R0, based on the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy Biosafety and Health 2 57-418
  • [4] Bax A(2013)Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 7 413-759
  • [5] Buonanno G(2007)Natural ventilation for the prevention of airborne contagion PLoS Medicine 4 e68-245
  • [6] Stabile L(1998)The relative efficacy of respirators and room ventilation in preventing occupational tuberculosis Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 19 754-1591
  • [7] Morawska L(1999)Methodology to perform clean air delivery rate type determinations with microbiological aerosols Aerosol Science and Technology 30 235-205
  • [8] D’Arienzo M(2020)Aerosol and surface distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in hospital wards, Wuhan, China, 2020 Emerging Infectious Diseases 26 1583-980
  • [9] Coniglio A(2012)Exhaled air dispersion during coughing with and without wearing a surgical or N95 mask PLoS One 7 e50845-950
  • [10] Davies A(2015)Contribution of outdoor-originating particles, indoor-emitted particles and indoor secondary organic aerosol (SOA) to residential indoor PM2.5 concentration: A model-based estimation Building and Environment 90 196-1207