Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography in stable coronary disease: a new standard in non-invasive testing?

被引:0
作者
B. L. Nørgaard
J. M. Jensen
J. Leipsic
机构
[1] Aarhus University Hospital Skejby,Department of Cardiology B
[2] St. Paul’s Hospital,Department Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2015年 / 25卷
关键词
Coronary artery disease; Coronary CT angiography; Fractional flow reserve; Invasive coronary angiography; Non-invasive imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured during invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard for lesion-specific decisions on coronary revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Current guidelines recommend non-invasive functional or anatomic testing as a gatekeeper to the catheterization laboratory. However, the “holy grail” in non-invasive testing of CAD is to establish a single test that quantifies both coronary lesion severity and the associated ischemia. Most evidence to date of such a test is based on the addition of computational analysis of FFR to the anatomic information obtained from standard-acquired coronary CTA data sets at rest (FFRCT). This review summarizes the clinical evidence for the use of FFRCT in stable CAD in context to the diagnostic performance of other non-invasive testing modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:2282 / 2290
页数:8
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Boden WE(2007)Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease N Engl J Med 356 1503-1516
[2]  
O’Rourke RA(2008)Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina J Am Coll Cardiol 52 636-643
[3]  
Teo KK(2010)Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2816-2821
[4]  
Meijboom WB(2003)Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography Circulation 107 2900-2907
[5]  
Van Mieghem CA(2008)Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy Circulation 117 1283-1291
[6]  
van Pelt N(2013)2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology Eur Heart J 34 2949-3003
[7]  
Tonino PA(2007)Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance Am Heart J 154 415-423
[8]  
Fearon WF(2012)Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Radiol 22 1881-1895
[9]  
De Bruyne B(2010)Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography N Engl J Med 362 886-895
[10]  
Hachamovitch R(2014)Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice Am Heart J 167 846-852