The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis

被引:0
作者
Masahiro Okada
Jun-ichi Fukada
Kazuhito Toya
Reiko Ito
Toshio Ohashi
Atsunori Yorozu
机构
[1] Tokyo Medical Center,Department of Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2005年 / 15卷
关键词
CT cholangiography; MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP); Maximum intensity projection (MIP); Multiplanar reformation (MPR); Choledocholithiasis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purposes of this study were to investigate the feasibility of drip infusion cholangiography computed tomography (CTCh) for choledocholithiasis and to compare the detection of the stone on CTCh with that of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). CTCh examinations were performed after infusion of intravenous biliary contrast material (iotroxic acid meglumine, 100 ml) for patients with suspected biliary diseases and were reconstructed to maximum intensity projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformation (MPR). Of 432 patients who underwent CTCh, we identified 15 who underwent surgery or cholangioscopic removal for choledocholithiasis and 32 patients who underwent cholecystectomy due to cholecystolithiasis. Their MRCP images were compared with the CTCh images. The sensitivity and specificity of CTCh for detecting choledochal stones were 87% and 96% whereas those of MRCP were 80% and 88%. The sensitivity and specificity of CTCh for detecting gallstones were 78% and 100% whereas those of MRCP were 94% and 88%. CTCh allowed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting choledochal stones but diminished the detection for cholecystolithiasis compared with MRCP.
引用
收藏
页码:2140 / 2145
页数:5
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Holzknecht N(1998)Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography Radiology 206 657-664
  • [2] Gauger J(1999)MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP Eur Radiol 9 1411-1417
  • [3] Sackmann M(2003)Oral contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications Eur Radiol 13 867-873
  • [4] Thoeni RF(2000)Reevaluation of spiral CT cholangiography: basic considerations and reliability for detecting choledocholithiasis in 80 patients J Comput Assist Tomogr 24 859-865
  • [5] Schurig J(2000)The clinical utility of spinal CT cholangiography Clinical Radiology 55 733-739
  • [6] Holl J(1980)Transhepatic cholangiography: complications and use patterns of the fine-needle technique: a multi-institutional survey Radiology 135 15-22
  • [7] Weinzierl M(1999)MR cholangiography and CT cholangiography of pediatric patients with choledochal cysts Am J Roentgenol 173 401-405
  • [8] Helmberger T(1998)Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography Am J Roentgenol 170 1055-1059
  • [9] Paumgartner G(1976)A practical reappraisal of the anatomy of the extrahepatic bile ducts and arteries Br J Surg 63 853-860
  • [10] Reiser M(2000)Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography Am J Roentgenol 175 713-720