Identifying Digital Transformation ParadoxesA Design Perspective

被引:0
作者
Lieselot Danneels
Stijn Viaene
机构
[1] Ghent University,Department of Public Governance and Management
[2] Vlerick Business School,Information Systems Management Cluster, Technology and Operations Management Area
[3] KU Leuven,Research Centre for Management Informatics
来源
Business & Information Systems Engineering | 2022年 / 64卷
关键词
Digital transformation; Paradox; Action design research; Design principles;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In turbulent contexts, organizations face contradictory challenges which give rise to management tensions and paradoxes. Digital transformation is one such context where the disruptive potential of digital technologies demands radical responses from existing organizations. While prior research has recognized the importance of coping with organizational paradoxes, little is known about how to identify them. Although it may be apparent in some settings which paradoxes are at play, other more ambivalent contexts require explicit identification. This study takes a design perspective to identify the relevant paradoxes in a digital transformation context. It presents the results of a 2-year action design research study in collaboration with an organization that chose to explicitly focus on paradoxical tensions for managing its digital transformation. The study’s main contribution is twofold: (1) it presents design knowledge to identify organizational paradoxes; (2) it provides a better understanding of the organizational paradoxes involved in digital transformation. The design knowledge will help others to identify paradoxes when working with an organization and highlights dynamic and collaborative aspects of the identification process. The study also enhances the descriptive understanding of digital transformation paradoxes by showing the importance of learning and belonging tensions and by expressing a different view on what knowledge about paradoxes is, and how it is created and used.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 500
页数:17
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [11] Pavlou PA(2013)Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact MIS Q 37 337-355
  • [12] Venkatraman N(2020)The anatomy of a design principle J Asssoc Inf Syst 21 1622-1652
  • [13] Carlo JL(2015)Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs Inf Syst Res 26 57-80
  • [14] Lyytinen K(2017)Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT MIS Q Exec 16 101-120
  • [15] Boland RJ(2004)Design science research in information systems MIS Q 28 75-105
  • [16] Danneels L(2002)Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers Admin Sci Q 47 31-69
  • [17] Viaene S(2015)Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research Eur J Inf Syst 24 107-115
  • [18] Donaldson T(2013)Responding to competing strategic demands: how organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve Strateg Organ 11 245-280
  • [19] Preston LE(1999)A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems MIS Q 23 67-94
  • [20] Farjoun M(2006)Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance Acad Manag J 49 1031-1057