Kaufmann has recently argued that the thesis according to which the probability of an indicative conditional equals the conditional probability of the consequent given the antecedent under certain specifiable circumstances deviates from intuition. He presents a method for calculating the probability of a conditional that does seem to give the intuitively correct result under those circumstances. However, the present paper shows that Kaufmann’s method is inconsistent in that it may lead one to assign different probabilities to a single conditional at the same time.
机构:
ISPA Inst Univ, William James Ctr Res, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, PortugalISPA Inst Univ, William James Ctr Res, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
Quelhas, Ana Cristina
Rasga, Celia
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
ISPA Inst Univ, William James Ctr Res, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, PortugalISPA Inst Univ, William James Ctr Res, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
Rasga, Celia
Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USAISPA Inst Univ, William James Ctr Res, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal