Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers' understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning

被引:0
作者
Johanna Velander
Mohammed Ahmed Taiye
Nuno Otero
Marcelo Milrad
机构
[1] Linnaeus University,Department of Computer Science and Media Technology
[2] Linnaeus University,Department of Cultural Sciences
[3] University of Greenwich,Department of Computing and Mathematical Science
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2024年 / 29卷
关键词
AI literacy; K-12 education; Teacher education; AI competence; K-12 curriculum;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Uncovering patterns and trends in vast, ever-increasing quantities of data has been enabled by different machine learning methods and techniques used in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Permeating many aspects of our lives and influencing our choices, development in this field continues to advance and increasingly impacts us as individuals and our society. The risks and unintended effects such as bias from input data or algorithm design have recently stirred discourse about how to inform and teach AI in K-12 education. As AI is a new topic not only for pupils in K-12 but also for teachers, new skill sets are required that enable critical engagement with AI. AI literacy is trying to close the gap between research and practical knowledge transfer of AI-related skills. Teachers' AI-related technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) are important factors for AI literacy. However, as teachers' perspectives, beliefs and views impact both the interpretation and operationalisation of curriculum. this study explores teachers' and teacher educators' understanding and preconceptions of AI to inform teacher education and professional development. To gain a comprehensive understanding of teachers’ conceptualisations regarding AI an anonymous questionnaire together with focus group discussions were employed. The qualitative content analysis underpinned by the theoretical framework Intelligent TPACK reveals that teachers' AI-related content knowledge is generally gained through incidental learning and often results in pre- and misconceptions of AI. Our analysis also revealed several potential challenges for teachers in achieving core constructs of Intelligent TPACK, examples of such challenges are vague and unclear guidelines in both policy and curriculum, a lack of understanding of AI and its limitations, as well as emotional responses related to participants' preconceptions. These insights are important to consider in designing teacher education and professional development related to AI literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:4085 / 4105
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Arrieta AB(2020)Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities, and challenges toward responsible AI Information Fusion 58 82-115
  • [2] Díaz-Rodríguez N(2023)Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education Computers in Human Behavior 138 107468-16
  • [3] Del Ser J(2020)Sustainable Curriculum Planning for Artificial Intelligence Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective Sustainability 12 14-161
  • [4] Bennetot A(2022)Survey: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Thinking and Learning KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 36 5-489
  • [5] Tabik S(2021)Contextualizing AI Education for K-12 Students to Enhance Their Learning of AI Literacy Through Culturally Responsive Approaches KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 35 153-36
  • [6] Barbado A(2005)Functional adult literacy and empowerment of women: Impact of a functional literacy program in Turkey Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 48 472-19
  • [7] Herrera F(2020)What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Ethical Algorithm Design. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 18 31-176
  • [8] Celik I(2013)Qualitative content analysis Journal of Education 193 13-35
  • [9] Chiu TKF(2004)A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning A Companion to Qualitative Research 1 159-152
  • [10] Chai C(2021)Focus groups ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54 1-130