Structure-based prediction of protein–protein binding affinity with consideration of allosteric effect

被引:0
作者
Feifei Tian
Yonggang Lv
Li Yang
机构
[1] Chongqing University,Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology Under Ministry of Education, ‘111’ Project Laboratory of Biomechanics and Tissue Repair, and Bioengineering College
[2] Southwest Jiaotong University,School of Life Science and Engineering
来源
Amino Acids | 2012年 / 43卷
关键词
Protein–protein binding; Noncovalent interaction; Allosteric effect; Quantitative structure–activity relationship; Statistical modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The conformational change upon protein–protein binding is largely ignored for a long time in the affinity prediction community. However, it is widely recognized that allosteric effect does play an important role in biomolecular recognition and association. In this article, we describe a new quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR)-based strategy to capture the structural and nonbonding information relating to not only the direct noncovalent interactions between protein binding partners, but also the indirect allosteric effect associated with binding. This method is then employed to quantitatively model and predict the protein–protein binding affinities compiled in a recently published benchmark consisting of 144 functionally diverse protein complexes with their structures available in both bound and unbound states (Kastritis et al. Protein Sci 20:482–491, 2011). With incorporating genetic algorithm and partial least squares regression (GA-PLS) into this method, a significant linear relationship between structural information descriptors and experimentally measured affinities is readily emerged and, on this basis, detailed discussions of physicochemical properties and structural implications underlying protein binding process, as well as the contribution of allosteric effect to the binding are addressed. We also give an empirical estimation of the prediction limit rpred2 = 0.80 for structure-based method used to determine protein–protein binding affinity.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 543
页数:12
相关论文
共 283 条
  • [1] Acharya KR(2005)The advantages and limitations of protein crystal structures Trends Pharm Sci 26 10-14
  • [2] Lloyd MD(2007)A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein–protein binding affinities Biophys Chem 129 198-211
  • [3] Audie J(2000)The protein data bank Nucleic Acids Res 28 235-242
  • [4] Scarlata S(2009)Low-resolution structures of transient protein–protein complexes using small-angle X-ray scattering J Am Chem Soc 131 4378-4386
  • [5] Berman HM(1998)Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces J Mol Biol 1998 1-9
  • [6] Westbrook J(1964)van der Waals volumes and radii J Phys Chem 68 441-451
  • [7] Feng Z(1989)New hydrogen-bond potentials for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure J Med Chem 32 1083-1094
  • [8] Gilliland G(2000)Evaluation of protein–protein association energies by free energy perturbation calculations Protein Eng 13 239-245
  • [9] Bhat TN(2002)Genetic algorithm guided selection: variable selection and subset selection J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42 927-936
  • [10] Weissig H(1995)A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone–receptor interface Science 267 383-386