Tolerance to refractive error with a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens

被引:5
作者
Black, Daniel A. [1 ]
Bala, Chandra [2 ]
Alarcon, Aixa [3 ]
Vilupuru, Srividhya [4 ]
机构
[1] Sunshine Eye Clin, Birtinya, Qld, Australia
[2] personalEYES, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
[3] Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Irvine, CA 92614 USA
关键词
DISSATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; IOL; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41433-024-03040-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the tolerance to refractive errors of a new purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL) using preclinical and clinical metrics. Methods: Preclinical evaluation included computer simulations of visual acuity (sVA) and dysphotopsia profile of different IOL designs (refractive EDF, diffractive EDF, multifocal, standard, and enhanced monofocals) using an appropriate eye model with and without +/- 0.50 D defocus and/or +0.75 D of astigmatism. Patients bilaterally implanted with a refractive EDF (Model ZEN00V) or an enhanced monofocal (Model ICB00) IOL from a prospective, randomized study were included. At the 6-month postoperative visit, uncorrected and corrected distance vision (UDVA and CDVA), visual symptoms, satisfaction and dependency on glasses were evaluated in a subgroup of patients with absolute residual refractive error of >0.25 D in one or both eyes. Results: In the presence of defocus and astigmatism, sVA was comparable for all except the multifocal IOL design. The refractive EDF was more tolerant to myopic outcomes and maintained a monofocal-like dysphotopsia profile with defocus. Binocular logMAR UDVA was -0.03 +/- 0.08 for ZEN00V and -0.02 +/- 0.11 for ICB00. 100% ZEN00V and 97% ICB00 patients did not need glasses and were satisfied with their distance vision. Monocular CDVA, contrast sensitivity and visual symptoms were also similar between both groups. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of the refractive EDF IOL demonstrated high quality distance vision and dysphotopsia comparable to a monofocal IOL, even in the presence of refractive error, thus matching the design expectations of the EDF IOL.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Alarcon A, EYE
[2]  
Alarcon A, 2023, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V64
[3]   Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Plaza-Puche, Ana B. ;
Fernandez-Buenaga, Roberto ;
Pikkel, Joseph ;
Maldonado, Miguel .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (05) :611-634
[4]   A Comparative Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses [J].
Ang, Robert Edward ;
Picache, Gian Carlo S. ;
Rivera, Mark Christian R. ;
Lopez, Lord Ryan L. ;
Cruz, Emerson M. .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 :2339-2351
[5]  
Aristodemou P., 2014, WORLD J OPHTHALMOL, V4, P140, DOI [10.5318/wjo.v4.i4.140, DOI 10.5318/WJO.V4.I4.140]
[6]   Clinical evaluation of a new monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in patients with cataract [J].
Auffarth, Gerd U. ;
Gerl, Matthias ;
Tsai, Linda ;
Janakiraman, D. Priya ;
Jackson, Beth ;
Alarcon, Aixa ;
Dick, H. Burkhard .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (02) :184-191
[7]   Multicountry clinical outcomes of a new nondiffractive presbyopia-correcting IOL [J].
Bala, Chandra ;
Poyales, Francisco ;
Guarro, Merce ;
Ruiz Mesa, Ramon ;
Mearza, Ali ;
Varma, Devesh Kumar ;
Jasti, Srichand ;
Lemp-Hull, Jessie .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (02) :136-143
[8]  
Canovas C, 2022, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V63
[9]  
Cochener B, 2016, DISCUSSION CLIN OUTC
[10]   Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study [J].
Cochener, Beatrice .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (09) :1268-1275