Socioeconomic Position and Reproduction: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health

被引:0
作者
N. Holowko
M. Jones
L. Tooth
I. Koupil
G. D. Mishra
机构
[1] The University of Queensland,Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health
[2] Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet,Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS)
[3] Karolinska Institutet,Department of Public Health Sciences
来源
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2018年 / 22卷
关键词
Socioeconomic position; Educational status; Reproduction; Age at first birth; Birth intervals; Birth-to-pregnancy interval;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate the association of socioeconomic position (SEP) with reproductive outcomes among Australian women. Methods: Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health’s (population-based cohort study) 1973–1978 cohort were used (N = 6899, aged 37–42 years in 2015). The association of SEP (childhood and own, multiple indicators) with age at first birth, birth-to-pregnancy (BTP) intervals and total number of children was analysed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: 14% of women had their first birth aged < 24 years. 29% of multiparous women had a BTP interval within the WHO recommendation (18–27 months). Women with a low SEP had increased odds of a first birth < 24 years: low (OR 7.0: 95% C.I. 5.3, 9.3) or intermediate education (OR 3.8: 2.8, 5.1); living in rural (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or remote (OR 2.1: 1.7, 2.7) areas; who found it sometimes (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or always difficult (OR 2.0: 1.6, 2.7) to manage on their income; and did not know their parent’s education (OR 4.5: 3.2, 6.4). Low SEP was associated with having a much longer than recommended BTP interval. Conclusion: As the first Australian study describing social differences in reproductive characteristics, these findings provide a base for reducing social inequalities in reproduction. Assisting adequate BTP spacing is important, particularly for women with existing elevated risks due to social disadvantage; including having a first birth < 24 years of age and a longer than recommended BTP interval. This includes reviewing services/access to postnatal support, free family planning/contraception clinics, and improved family policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1713 / 1724
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [1] Aitken Z(2016)Young maternal age at first birth and mental health later in life: Does the association vary by birth cohort? Social Science Medicine 157 9-17
  • [2] Hewitt B(2006)Social differentials in speed-premium effects in childbearing in Sweden Demographic Research 14 51-70
  • [3] Keogh L(2002)Who does not gain weight? Prevalence and predictors of weight maintenance in young women International Journal of Obesity Related Metabolic Disorder 26 1570-1578
  • [4] LaMontagne AD(2014)Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: Retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother BMJ 349 g4333-247
  • [5] Bentley R(2001)The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women Social Science Research 30 219-92
  • [6] Kavanagh AM(2016)Reproductive history and post-reproductive mortality: A sibling comparison analysis using Swedish register data Social Science Medicine 155 82-104
  • [7] Andersson G(2005)Number of children and the risk of obesity in older women Preventive Medicine 40 99-717
  • [8] Hoem J(2013)Persistent effects of women’s parity and breastfeeding patterns on their body mass index: Results from the Million Women Study International Journal of Obesity 37 712-170
  • [9] Duvander A(2010)Effects of having a baby on weight gain American Journal of Preventive Medicine 38 163-1823
  • [10] Ball K(2006)Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis JAMA 295 1809-308