Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature

被引:0
作者
Ciro Esposito
Mariapina Cerulo
Benedetta Lepore
Vincenzo Coppola
Daniela D’Auria
Giorgia Esposito
Roberto Carulli
Fulvia Del Conte
Maria Escolino
机构
[1] “Federico II” University of Naples School of Medicine,Department of Translational Medical Sciences (DISMET), Pediatric Surgery Unit
[2] Free University of Bolzano,Faculty of Computer Science
[3] University of Naples “Federico II”,Internal Medicine Unit
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
Pediatric urology; UPJO; Robotic pyeloplasty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic pyeloplasty has become a natural progression from the development of open, then laparoscopic procedures to treat pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RALP) is now considered a new gold standard in pediatric MIS. A systematic review of the literature retrieved from PubMed and published in the last 10 years (2012–2022) was performed. This review underlines that in all children except the smallest infants, where the open procedure has benefits in terms of duration of general anesthetic and there are limitations in the size of instruments, robotic pyeloplasty is becoming the preferred procedure to perform in patients with UPJO. Results for the robotic approach are extremely promising, with shorter operative times than laparoscopy and equal success rates, length of stay and complications. In case of redo pyeloplasty, RALP is easier to perform than other open or MIS procedures. By 2009, robotic surgery became the most used modality to treat all UPJO and continues to grow in popularity. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is safe and effective with excellent outcomes, even in redo pyeloplasty or challenging anatomical cases. Moreover, robotic approach shortens the learning curve for junior surgeons, who can readily achieve levels of expertise comparable to senior practitioners. However, there are still concerns regarding the cost associated with this procedure. Further high-quality prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as new technologies specific for the pediatric population, are advisable for RALP to reach the level of gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1246
页数:7
相关论文
共 185 条
[1]  
Li B(2020)Ultrasound-based scoring system for indication of pyeloplasty in patients with UPJO-like hydronephrosis Front Pediatr 8 353-607
[2]  
McGrath M(2016)Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery Pediatr Surg Int 32 599-613
[3]  
Farrokhyar F(2012)Pediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerations J Endourol 26 602-752
[4]  
Salö M(2004)Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology Urol Clin North Am 31 743-977
[5]  
Sjöberg Altemani T(2008)Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology Pediatr Surg Int 24 973-877
[6]  
Anderberg M(2015)Factors associated with age at pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction Pediatr Surg Int 31 871-396
[7]  
Tomaszewski JJ(2019)Pediatric Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter? Pediatr Surg Int 35 391-385
[8]  
Casella DP(2014)Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort J Pediatr Urol 10 380-1873
[9]  
Turner RM(2015)Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 20 Kg by weight: single-center experience World J Urol 33 1867-1840
[10]  
Peters CA(2020)Robotic surgery in infants and children: an argument for smaller and fewer incisions World J Urol 38 1835-2650