Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences

被引:0
|
作者
Stella M. K. Glasauer
Stephan C. F. Neuhauss
机构
[1] University of Zurich,Institute of Molecular Life Sciences
[2] University of Zurich,Life Science Zurich Graduate School
来源
关键词
Gene pairs; Paralogue; Subfunctionalization; Neofunctionalization; Radiation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Whole-genome duplication (WGD) events have shaped the history of many evolutionary lineages. One such duplication has been implicated in the evolution of teleost fishes, by far the most species-rich vertebrate clade. After initial controversy, there is now solid evidence that such event took place in the common ancestor of all extant teleosts. It is termed teleost-specific (TS) WGD. After WGD, duplicate genes have different fates. The most likely outcome is non-functionalization of one duplicate gene due to the lack of selective constraint on preserving both. Mechanisms that act on preservation of duplicates are subfunctionalization (partitioning of ancestral gene functions on the duplicates), neofunctionalization (assigning a novel function to one of the duplicates) and dosage selection (preserving genes to maintain dosage balance between interconnected components). Since the frequency of these mechanisms is influenced by the genes’ properties, there are over-retained classes of genes, such as highly expressed ones and genes involved in neural function. The consequences of the TS-WGD, especially its impact on the massive radiation of teleosts, have been matter of controversial debate. It is evident that gene duplications are crucial for generating complexity and that WGDs provide large amounts of raw material for evolutionary adaptation and innovation. However, it is less clear whether the TS-WGD is directly linked to the evolutionary success of teleosts and their radiation. Recent studies let us conclude that TS-WGD has been important in generating teleost complexity, but that more recent ecological adaptations only marginally related to TS-WGD might have even contributed more to diversification. It is likely, however, that TS-WGD provided teleosts with diversification potential that can become effective much later, such as during phases of environmental change.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1060
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication
    Salman-Minkov, Ayelet
    Sabath, Niv
    Mayrose, Itay
    NATURE PLANTS, 2016, 2 (08)
  • [32] Rearrangement rate following the whole-genome duplication in teleosts
    Semon, Marie
    Wolfe, Kenneth H.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2007, 24 (03) : 860 - 867
  • [33] Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication
    Simen R. Sandve
    Rori V. Rohlfs
    Torgeir R. Hvidsten
    Nature Genetics, 2018, 50 : 908 - 909
  • [34] Polyploidy in fungi: evolution after whole-genome duplication
    Albertin, Warren
    Marullo, Philippe
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 279 (1738) : 2497 - 2509
  • [35] Evolution After Whole-Genome Duplication: A Network Perspective
    Zhu, Yun
    Lin, Zhenguo
    Nakhleh, Luay
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2013, 3 (11): : 2049 - 2057
  • [36] A reappraisal of the phylogenetic placement of the Aquilegia whole-genome duplication
    Tao Shi
    Jinming Chen
    Genome Biology, 21
  • [37] Impact of whole-genome duplication on vertebrate development and evolution
    Kasahara, Masanori
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 81 - 82
  • [38] A reappraisal of the phylogenetic placement of the Aquilegia whole-genome duplication
    Shi, Tao
    Chen, Jinming
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [39] Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication
    Ayelet Salman-Minkov
    Niv Sabath
    Itay Mayrose
    Nature Plants, 2 (8)
  • [40] Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication
    Sandve, Simen R.
    Rohlfs, Rori V.
    Hvidsten, Torgeir R.
    NATURE GENETICS, 2018, 50 (07) : 908 - 909