Efficacy of different inoculum forms of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2IIIB for resistance screening of sugar beet varieties

被引:0
作者
M. Z. R. Bhuiyan
Luis E. del Río Mendoza
Dilip K. Lakshman
Aiming Qi
M. F. R. Khan
机构
[1] North Dakota State University,Department of Plant Pathology
[2] USDA-ARS,Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory
[3] University of Hertfordshire,Centre for Agriculture, Food and Environmental Management Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences
关键词
Sugar beet; Soilborne pathogen; Inoculum types; Resistance screening; Disease management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is one of the major sugar sources in the world. Rhizoctonia solani causes damping-off and crown and root rot that can result in significant yield and economic losses. R. solani AG 2–2 IIIB is the most damaging anastomosis group in sugar beet production. In this study, we evaluated three different types of inoculums, namely barley grains colonized by fungal mycelium (CBG), agar plugs containing fungal mycelia (MAP), and sclerotia (SCL) for their ease of production and efficacy in inducing disease in sugar beet. First, the fungal growth rate and sclerotia production were compared on six types of media, clarified V8 [CV8], potato dextrose agar [PDA], metalaxyl benomyl vancomycin agar [MBV], yeast malt agar [YMA], corn meal agar [CMA], and oatmeal agar [OMA]. The fungus grew faster and produced more sclerotia in CV8 medium than in other media (P < 0.05). The rate of fungal growth from CBG, MAP, and SCL was evaluated. The in vitro rate of growth of R. solani was faster when originated from MAP than from SCL (P < 0.05) but equal to that from CBG. The different inoculum forms were then used to inoculate seeds at planting and 4-leaf stage sugar beet plants to evaluate the disease incidence and severity. R. solani on CBG caused greater severity. Overall, CBG was the best form of inoculum due to its ease of inoculum production, low cost, and ability to consistently cause severe disease symptoms on sugar beet plants.
引用
收藏
页码:1551 / 1561
页数:10
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Aliferis KA(2010)Metabolite composition and bioactivity of Rhizoctonia solani sclerotial exudates J Agric Food Chem 58 7604-7615
[2]  
Jabaji S(1982)The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani Annu Rev Phytopathol 20 329-347
[3]  
Anderson NA(2010)Build up of patches caused by Rhizoctonia solani Soil Biol Biochem 42 1661-1672
[4]  
Anees M(2014)Molecular markers for genotyping anastomosis groups and understanding the population biology of Rhizoctonia species J Gen Plant Pathol 80 401-407
[5]  
Edel-Hermann V(2017)Control of Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet and effect of fungicide application & plant cultivar on inoculum potential in the soil Plant Dis 101 941-947
[6]  
Steinberg C(2012)Resistance testing of sugar beet varieties against Rhizoctonia solani Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie 137 49-57
[7]  
Arakawa M(2004)Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot Plant Breed 123 158-166
[8]  
Inagaki K(2010)Temperature, moisture, and fungicide effects in managing Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of sugar beet Phytopathology 100 689-697
[9]  
Bartholomäus A(2021)Effects of Inoculum Density and Cultivar Susceptibility on Rhizoctonia Damping-Off and Crown and Root Rot in Sugar Beet Plant Dis 105 1019-1025
[10]  
Mittler S(1993)Pre-breeding for root-rot resistance Journal of Sugar Beet Research 30 241-251