Carotid Artery Stenting: Single-Center Experience Over 11 Years

被引:0
作者
Richard Nolz
Rüdiger Egbert Schernthaner
Manfred Cejna
Melanie Schernthaner
Johannes Lammer
Maria Schoder
机构
[1] Medical University of Vienna,Department of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
[2] LKH Feldkirch,Department of Radiology
来源
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010年 / 33卷
关键词
Carotid artery stenting; Stroke; Spasm; Learning curve; In-stent-restenosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article reports the results of carotid artery stenting during an 11-year period. Data from 168 carotid artery stenting procedures (symptomatic, n = 55; asymptomatic, n = 101; symptoms not accessible, n = 12) were retrospectively collected. Primary technical success rate, neurological events in-hospital, access-site complications, and contrast-induced nephropathy (n = 118) were evaluated. To evaluate the influence of experience in carotid artery stenting on intraprocedural neurologic complications, patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included the first 80 treated patients, and group 2 the remainder of the patients (n = 88). In-stent restenoses at last-follow-up examinations (n = 89) were assessed. The overall primary technical success rate was 95.8%. The in-hospital stroke-death rate was 3.0% (n = 5; symptomatic, 5.4%; asymptomatic, 2.0%; p = 0.346). Neurologic complications were markedly higher in group 1 (4.2%; three major strokes; symptomatic, 2.8%, asymptomatic, 1.4%) compared to group 2 (2.4%; one major and one minor stroke—symptomatic, 1.2%, asymptomatic 1.2%), but this was not statistically significant. Further complications were access-site complications in 12 (7.1%), with surgical revision required in 1 (0.6%) and mild contrast-induced nephropathy in 1 (0.85%). Twenty-one (23.6%) patients had >50% in-stent restenosis during a mean follow-up of 28.2 months. In conclusion, advanced experience in carotid artery stenting leads to an acceptable periprocedural stroke-death rate. In-stent restenosis could be a critical factor during the follow-up course.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Lloyd-Jones D(2009)Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation 119 e21-e181
[2]  
Adams R(1998)Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators N Engl J Med 339 1415-1425
[3]  
Carnethon M(1998)Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European carotid surgery trial (ECST) Lancet 351 1379-1387
[4]  
Barnett HJ(2004)Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial Lancet 363 1491-1502
[5]  
Taylor DW(2008)Predictors of death and stroke after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a subgroup analysis of the Pro-CAS data Stroke 39 2325-2330
[6]  
Eliasziw M(2003)Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60 259-266
[7]  
ECST MRC(2004)Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 351 1493-1501
[8]  
Halliday A(2006)Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis N Engl J Med 355 1660-1671
[9]  
Mansfield A(2006)30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial Lancet 368 1239-1247
[10]  
Marro J(2004)Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase J Vasc Surg 40 1106-1111