Functional characterization of BRCA1 gene variants by mini-gene splicing assay

被引:0
作者
Ane Y Steffensen
Mette Dandanell
Lars Jønson
Bent Ejlertsen
Anne-Marie Gerdes
Finn C Nielsen
Thomas vO Hansen
机构
[1] Center for Genomic Medicine,Department of Oncology
[2] Rigshospitalet,Department of Clinical Genetics
[3] University of Copenhagen,undefined
[4] Rigshospitalet,undefined
[5] Rigshospitalet,undefined
来源
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2014年 / 22卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mutational screening of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 leads to the identification of numerous pathogenic variants such as frameshift and nonsense variants, as well as large genomic rearrangements. The screening moreover identifies a large number of variants, for example, missense, silent, and intron variants, which are classified as variants of unknown clinical significance owing to the lack of causal evidence. Variants of unknown clinical significance can potentially have an impact on splicing and therefore functional examinations are warranted to classify whether these variants are pathogenic or benign. Here we validate a mini-gene splicing assay by comparing the results of 24 variants with previously published data from RT-PCR analysis on RNA from blood samples/lymphoblastoid cell lines. The analysis showed an overall concordance of 100%. In addition, we investigated 13 BRCA1 variants of unknown clinical significance or putative variants affecting splicing by in silico analysis and mini-gene splicing assay. Both the in silico analysis and mini-gene splicing assay classified six BRCA1 variants as pathogenic (c.80+1G>A, c.132C>T (p.=), c.213−1G>A, c.670+1delG, c.4185+1G>A, and c.5075−1G>C), whereas six BRCA1 variants were classified as neutral (c.-19-22_-19-21dupAT, c.302−15C>G, c.547+14delG, c.4676−20A>G, c.4987−21G>T, and c.5278−14C>G) and one BRCA1 variant remained unclassified (c.670+16G>A). In conclusion, our study emphasizes that in silico analysis and mini-gene splicing assays are important for the classification of variants, especially if no RNA is available from the patient. This knowledge is crucial for proper genetic counseling of patients and their family members.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1368
页数:6
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Antoniou A(2003)Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies Am J Hum Genet 72 1117-1130
[2]  
Pharoah PD(2003)Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Science 302 643-646
[3]  
Narod S(2010)Penetrance of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: high cancer incidence at older age Breast Cancer Res Treat 124 643-651
[4]  
King MC(2008)BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Danish families with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer Acta Oncol 47 772-777
[5]  
Marks JH(2008)Novel BMC Med Genet 9 58-550
[6]  
Mandell JB(2010) BRCA2 mutation in a patient with a family history of breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 119 547-323
[7]  
van der Kolk DM(2009)The silent mutation nucleotide 744 G —> A, Lys172Lys, in exon 6 of BRCA2 results in exon skipping Breast Cancer Res Treat 115 315-287
[8]  
de Bock GH(2010)Large BRCA1 and BRCA2 genomic rearrangements in Danish high risk breast-ovarian cancer families Fam Cancer 9 283-1023
[9]  
Leegte BK(2012)Identification of a Danish breast/ovarian cancer family double heterozygote for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations Breast Cancer Res Treat 132 1009-1967
[10]  
Thomassen M(2010)Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing variants: a collaborative report by ENIGMA consortium members Clin Cancer Res 16 1957-446