Acknowledging diversity in knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship: assessing the Brazilian small business innovation research

被引:0
作者
Sergio Salles-Filho
Bruno Fischer
Yohanna Juk
Paulo Feitosa
Fernando A. B. Colugnati
机构
[1] University of Campinas,Department of Science and Technology Policy, Institute of Geosciences
[2] University of Campinas,School of Applied Sciences
[3] University of Sao Paulo,School of Communications and Arts
[4] Federal University of Juiz de Fora,Department of Internship, Medicine School
来源
The Journal of Technology Transfer | 2023年 / 48卷
关键词
SBIR; Evaluation; Entrepreneurship; PIPE; Entrepreneurship-oriented policies; Brazil; Performance; Heterogeneity; Cluster analysis; L26; O38; O31;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article analyzes a policy instrument that nurtures knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The PIPE Program is a small-business innovation research run by The Sao Paulo Research Foundation since 1997. While prior literature has pointed out that firm-level heterogeneity is an important feature to consider when evaluating these kinds of policies, heterogeneity has not been appropriately addressed as a factor of consideration for improving funding effectiveness. This study contributes to the literature by empirically appraising the Brazilian PIPE Program, while explicitly considering heterogeneity across firms. We conduct an empirical evaluation of a set of companies funded and non-funded by PIPE employing a multiple correspondence analysis followed by a clustering analysis. The results identify firm performance patterns on different dimensions, determining that the effects associated with the PIPE vary according to firm characteristics. Findings underscore the need to incorporate heterogeneity across firm types as a relevant source of evidence in funding instruments to support policy design and decision-making toward a more effective allocation of resources.
引用
收藏
页码:1446 / 1465
页数:19
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]  
Ács Z(2004)Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities Regional Studies 38 911-927
[2]  
Armington C(2008)Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions Small Business Economics 31 219-234
[3]  
Ács Z(2004)Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics 23 127-135
[4]  
Desai S(2021)Ecosystems of entrepreneurship: Configurations and critical dimensions Annals of Regional Science 67 73-106
[5]  
Hessels J(2018)Under the AEGIS of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship: Employment growth and gender of founders among European firms Small Business Economics 50 899-915
[6]  
Aernoudt R(2017)On the failure of scientific research: An analysis of SBIR projects funded by the U.S National Institutes of Health Scientometrics 112 431-442
[7]  
Alves A(2018)Innovation capital The Journal of Technology Transfer 43 1760-1767
[8]  
Fischer B(2020)Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives Research Policy 37 1-17
[9]  
Vonortas N(2012)Entrepreneurship and innovation: Public policy frameworks Journal of Technology Transfer 15 1103-1113
[10]  
Amoroso S(2019)The fountain of knowledge: an epistemological perspective on the growth of U.S. SBIR-funded firms International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 31 145-158