Implicature and non-local pragmatic encroachment

被引:0
作者
Dustin Locke
机构
[1] Claremont McKenna College,
来源
Synthese | 2017年 / 194卷
关键词
Knowledge; Pragmatic encroachment; Practical reasoning; Stakes sensitivity; Implicature; Treating as true;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper offers a novel conversational implicature account of the pragmatic sensitivity of knowledge attributions. Developing an account I first suggested elsewhere (Locke, Inquiry 57:28–54, 2014b) and independently proposed by Lutz (in Synthese 191:1717–1740, 2014), this paper explores the idea that the relevant implicatures are generated by a constitutive relationship between believing a proposition and a disposition to treat that proposition as true in practical deliberation. I argue that while this view has a certain advantage over standard implicature accounts of pragmatic sensitivity, it comes with a significant concession to proponents of pragmatic encroachment. On the account offered here, knowledge attributions have locally-pragmatically-sensitive implicatures because they have non-locally-pragmatically-sensitive entailments. The view thus represents a unique and powerful hybrid of these two approaches to the pragmatic sensitivity of knowledge attributions.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 654
页数:23
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Brown J(2006)Contextualism and warranted assertability manoeuvers Philosophical Studies 130 407-435
  • [2] Brown J(2008)Knowledge and practical reasoning Philosophy Compass 3 1135-1152
  • [3] Buchak L(2014)Belief, credence, and norms Philosophical Studies 169 285-311
  • [4] Buckwalter W(2010)Knowledge isn’t closed on Saturday: A study in ordinary language Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 395-406
  • [5] Comesaña J(2005)Unsafe knowledge Synthese 146 395-404
  • [6] DeRose K(1992)Contextualism and knowledge attributions Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 513-529
  • [7] DeRose K(2002)Assertion, knowledge, and context Philosophical Review 111 167-203
  • [8] Fantl J(2007)On pragmatic encroachment in epistemology Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 558-589
  • [9] McGrath M(2009)Evidence, pragmatics, and justification Philosophical Review 111 67-94
  • [10] Fantl J(2010)Do you know more when it matters less? Philosophical Psychology 23 683-706