Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized cancer patients: prophylaxis failure or failure to prophylax!

被引:0
作者
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
Faisal Albadainah
Shadi Hijjawi
Asem Mansour
Imad Treish
机构
[1] King Hussein Cancer Center,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
[2] King Hussein Cancer Center,Department of Radiology
[3] King Hussein Cancer Center,Department of Pharmacy
来源
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | 2011年 / 31卷
关键词
Cancer; Heparin; Low molecular weight heparin; Thromboembolism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cancer patients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulants, when used for prophylaxis, had successfully reduced the incidence of VTE in high risk patients. Nevertheless, many registry studies have shown low compliance rate with published prophylaxis guidelines. From January 2004 through June 2008, hospital database was searched for all discharge diagnoses of cancer with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Prophylaxis rate for the whole group and for subgroups in relation to recent hospitalization, duration of cancer diagnosis and number of other coexisting risk factors were studied. Two hundred patients were identified; majority (91.8%) had advanced-stage cancer at time of VTE diagnosis. In addition to cancer, many patients had multiple coexisting risk factors for VTE with 137 (68.5%) patients had at least three while 71 (35.5%) had four or more. Overall, 111(55.5%) patients developed lower-extremity DVT while 52 (26%) patients developed PE, other sites accounted for 18%. Majority of the patients (72%) had VTE diagnosed within the first 12 months following cancer diagnosis. Almost three quarters of the patients (73.5%) had not received any antecedent prophylaxis. Prophylaxis rate was 23% among patients with ≥3 risk factors and 50% among the highest risk group with ≥5 risk factors. Based on our findings, majority of VTE in cancer patients occurred due to failure to offer prophylaxis, minority were due to prophylaxis failure. Meticulous quality improvement programs should be established to emphasize the importance of implementing more intensive prophylaxis among high-risk cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:5
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Kniffin WD(1994)The epidemiology of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in the elderly Arch Intern Med 154 861-866
  • [2] Baron JA(1981)Prevention of deep vein thrombosis in medical patients by low-dose heparin Scott Med J 26 115-117
  • [3] Barret J(1996)The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis Ann Intern Med 125 1-7
  • [4] Belch JJ(1992)The clinical course of pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med 326 1240-1245
  • [5] Lowe GDO(2004)Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med 350 2257-2264
  • [6] Ward AG(2000)Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 343 1846-1850
  • [7] Prandoni P(2000)Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case–control study Arch Intern Med 160 809-815
  • [8] Lensing AW(2002)Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study Arch Intern Med 162 1245-1248
  • [9] Cogo A(2002)Variation in relative risk of venous thromboembolism in different cancers Thromb Haemost 87 1076-1077
  • [10] Carson JL(2007)CURVE study investigators. Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada Thromb Res 119 145-155