Mayetiola destructor (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) host preference and survival on small grains with respect to leaf reflectance and phytohormone concentrations

被引:0
作者
Rohollah Sadeghi
Steven Odubiyi
Atoosa Nikoukar
Kurtis L. Schroeder
Arash Rashed
机构
[1] University of Idaho,Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences
[2] University of Idaho,Department of Plant Science
来源
Scientific Reports | / 11卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Hessian fly Mayetiola destructor (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) is a major pest of wheat, globally. We conducted a series of laboratory choice and no-choice assays to quantify Hessian fly host preference for barley (cv. Champion), oat (cv. Cayuse), susceptible (cv. Alturas), and resistant (cv. Hollis) wheat. In addition, larval survivorship and adult emergence were compared among the evaluated host plants. We then examined whether insect preference for a host can be explained by differences in plant spectral reflectance. Further, larval survivorship and adult emergence were compared among host plants in relation to phytohormone concentrations. Hessian flies laid more eggs on wheat compared to either oat or barley. Spectral reflectance measurements of leaves were similar between susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars but different from those of barley and oat. Our results suggested that higher reflectance in the near-infrared range and lower reflectance in the visible range may be used by females for host selection. Hessian fly larvae were unable to develop into the pupal stage on resistant wheat and oat. No significant difference in larval survivorship was detected between the susceptible wheat and barley. However, adult emergence was significantly higher on barley than the susceptible wheat. Phytohormonal evaluations revealed that salicylic acid (SA) may be an important contributor to plant defense response to larval feeding as relatively higher concentrations of SA were present in oat and resistant wheat. While resistance in the resistant wheat is achieved only through antibiosis, both antibiosis and antixenosis were in effect rendering oat as a non-host for Hessian flies.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 140 条
  • [1] Wiseman BR(1994)Plant-resistance to insects in integrated pest-management Plant Dis. 78 927-932
  • [2] Orr DB(1986)Influence of plant antibiosis through four trophic levels Oecologia 70 242-249
  • [3] Boethel DJ(2011)Molecular Bases of Plant Resistance to Arthropods Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57 309-328
  • [4] Smith CM(2010)Changes in properties of wheat leaf cuticle during interactions with Hessian fly Plant J 63 31-43
  • [5] Clement SL(2004)Economic impact of Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on spring wheat in Oregon and additive yield losses with Fusarium crown rot and lesion nematode J Econ Entomol 97 397-408
  • [6] Kosma DK(2001)Oviposition preferences of the Hessian fly and their consequences for the survival and reproductive potential of offspring Ecol. Entomol. 26 473-486
  • [7] Nemacheck JA(2013)Why oviposit there? Fitness consequences of a gall midge choosing the plant's youngest leaf Environ Entomol 42 123-130
  • [8] Jenks MA(2000)Physical features of grass leaves influence the placement of eggs within the plant by the Hessian fly Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96 69-80
  • [9] Williams CE(1990)Chemical, color, and tactile cues influencing oviposition behavior of the Hessian fly (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) Environ. Entomol. 19 303-308
  • [10] Smiley RW(2000)Leaf physical and chemical features influence selection of plant genotypes by hessian fly J. Chem. Ecol. 26 2335-2354