“HIGH-RISK”: A Useful Tool for Improving Police Decision-Making in Hostage and Barricade Incidents

被引:4
作者
Beauregard E. [1 ]
Michaud P. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, (British Columbia)
[2] School of Criminology, University of Montreal, C.P. 6127, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, H3C 3J7, (Quebec)
关键词
crisis negotiation; critical incidents; decision support system; hostage situation; police decision-making;
D O I
10.1007/s11896-014-9151-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study is to examine several combinations of risk factors known to the police – i.e., perpetrator and situational characteristics of the incidents – leading to two possible outcomes in domestic hostage and barricade incidents (HBI): autoaggressive and heteroaggressive behaviors from the perpetrator. Using a series of conjunctive analyses on a sample of 534 hostage and barricade incidents, results show that, depending on the specific combination of factors, the likelihood of violence could very much vary, suggesting that the checklist approach is not adequate for risk assessment in hostage and barricade incidents. HIGH-RISK represents a decision support system that can be easily integrated to any crisis-intervention structure (CIS) or police unit dealing with hostage and barricade incidents. © 2014, Society for Police and criminal Psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beauregard E., Deslauriers-Varin, St-Yves M., Interactions between factors related to the decision of sex offenders to confess during police interrogation: A classification-tree approach, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, pp. 343-367, (2010)
  • [2] Beauregard E., Mieczkowski T., Outside the interrogation room: The context of confession in sexual crimes, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 34, pp. 246-264, (2011)
  • [3] Bennell C., Improving police decision making: General principles and practical applications of receiver operating characteristics analysis, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, pp. 1157-1175, (2005)
  • [4] Bolz F.A., Intelligence requirements in hostage situations, The Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 1, pp. 61-68, (2001)
  • [5] Call J.A., Negotiating crises: The evolution of hostage/barricade crisis negotiation, Journal of Threat Assessment, 2, 3, pp. 69-94, (2003)
  • [6] Canter D., Offender profiling and criminal differentiation, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, pp. 23-46, (2000)
  • [7] Canter D., Coffey T., Huntley M., Missen C., Predicting serial killers’ home base using a decision support system, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, pp. 457-478, (2000)
  • [8] Canter D., Hammond L., Youngs D., Juszczak P., The efficacy of ideographic models for geographical offender profiling, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, pp. 423-446, (2013)
  • [9] Chen H., Zeng D., Atabakhsh H., Wyzga W., Schroeder J., COPLINK managing law enforcement data and knowledge, Communications of the ACM, 46, pp. 28-34, (2003)
  • [10] Dhami M.K., Psychological models of professional decision making, Psychological Science, 14, pp. 175-180, (2003)