Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Bagging Ensemble Based Alternating Decision Trees, Logistic Regression and J48 Decision Trees Methods: A Comparative Study

被引:117
作者
Pham B.T. [1 ]
Tien Bui D. [2 ]
Prakash I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geotechnical Engineering, University of Transport Technology, 54 Trieu Khuc, Thanh Xuan, Ha Noi
[2] Geographic Information System Group, Department of Business and IT, University College of Southeast Norway, Gulbringvegen 36, Bø i Telemark
[3] Department of Science and Technology, Bhaskarcharya Institute for Space Applications and Geo-Informatics (BISAG), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
关键词
Alternating decision trees; Bagging ensemble; Decision trees; GIS; India; Landslides; Logistic regression;
D O I
10.1007/s10706-017-0264-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we have evaluated and compared prediction capability of Bagging Ensemble Based Alternating Decision Trees (BADT), Logistic Regression (LR), and J48 Decision Trees (J48DT) for landslide susceptibility mapping at part of the Uttarakhand State (India). The BADT method has been proposed in the present study which is a novel hybrid machine learning ensemble approach of bagging ensemble and alternating decision trees. The J48DT is a relative new machine learning technique which has been applied only in few landslide studies, and the LR is known as a popular landslide susceptibility model. For the model studies, a spatial database of 930 historical landslide events and 15 landslide affecting factors have been collected and analyzed. This database has been used to build and validate the landslide models namely BADT, LR and J48DT Predictive capability of these models has been validated and compared using statistical analyzing methods and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results show that these three landslide models (BADT, LR and J48DT) performed well with the training dataset. However, using the validation dataset the BADT model has the highest prediction capability, followed by the LR model, and the J48DT model, respectively. This indicates that the BADT is a promising method which can be used for landslide susceptibility assessment also for other landslide prone areas. © 2017, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:2597 / 2611
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Ayalew L., Yamagishi H., The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains Central Japan, Geomorphology, 65, pp. 15-31, (2005)
[2]  
Ayalew L., Yamagishi H., Ugawa N., Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River Niigata Prefecture, Japan, Landslides, 1, pp. 73-81, (2004)
[3]  
Bai S.-B., Wang J., Lu G.-N., Zhou P.-G., Hou S.-S., Xu S.-N., GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the three Gorges area China, Geomorphology, 115, pp. 23-31, (2010)
[4]  
Breiman L., Bagging predictors, Mach Learn, 24, pp. 123-140, (1996)
[5]  
Chauhan S., Sharma M., Arora M., Gupta N., Landslide susceptibility zonation through ratings derived from artificial neural network, Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 12, pp. 340-350, (2010)
[6]  
Choi J., Oh H.-J., Won J.-S., Lee S., Validation of an artificial neural network model for landslide susceptibility mapping, Environ Earth Sci, 60, pp. 473-483, (2010)
[7]  
Doshi M., Chaturvedi S.K., Correlation based feature selection (CFS) technique to predict student performance, Int J Comput Netw Commun (UCNC), 6, (2014)
[8]  
Dreiseitl S., Ohno-Machado L., Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review, J Biomed Inform, 35, pp. 352-359, (2002)
[9]  
Ercanoglu M., Gokceoglu C., Van Asch T.W., Landslide susceptibility zoning north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques, Nat Hazard, 32, pp. 1-23, (2004)
[10]  
Francis J., Tontisirin N., Anantsuksomsri S., Vink J., Zhong V., Alternative strategies for mapping ACS Estimates and error of estimation, Emerging techniques in applied demography, pp. 247-273, (2015)