Comparison of HbA1c and FPG as a screening tool for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Indian population

被引:0
|
作者
Rajesh Rajput
Ompal Saini
Meena Rajput
Vijay Shankar
机构
[1] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Endocrinology and Medicine Unit VI
[2] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Community Medicine
[3] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Biochemistry
[4] PGIMS,Department of Endocrinology and Medicine Unit VI
来源
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries | 2015年 / 35卷
关键词
HbA1c; FPG; OGTT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests as a mass screening tool for pre-diabetes and diabetes as defined by standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The study was community-based cross-sectional and carried out in urban field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine at Rohtak. A day before the study, subjects were advised to observe overnight fasting (at least 8 h) and were called at the nearest health center in the morning. Initial evaluation included detailed history and clinical examination to exclude any systemic diseases. FPG and 2-h plasma glucose after 75 g OGTT was used to diagnose pre-diabetes and diabetes in 1008 participant. Fasting plasma glucose and 2-h post glucose load were estimated by glucose oxidase method. HbA1c was measured using Cone lab 30i autoanlyser based on latex agglutination inhibition assay (EIA). The American Diabetic Association (ADA) criteria were used to categorize the subjects into pre-diabetes and diabetes (American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care; 33 Suppl 1:S62–9, 2010). Performance of HbA1c and FPG was evaluated against the results of OGTT by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The prevalence of pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed diabetes was found 20.6 and 12.5 %, respectively. For pre-diabetes, the area under the ROC curve was 0.831 for HbA1c and 0.807 for FPG (p value 0.205), whereas for diabetes, these values were 0.957 for HbA1c and 0.942 for FPG (p value 0.11). At the optimal HbA1c cutoff points of 5.4 % for pre-diabetes and of 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, sensitivities and specificities were 79.02, 79.31 and 94.24, 90.52 %, respectively. Similarly, FPG optimal cutoff points of ≥97 mg/dl for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl for diabetes were found to have maximum sensitivities (specificities) of 93.13 (63.32) and 93.53 (89.64), respectively. It is observed that at optimal cutoff of FPG ≥97 mg/dl and HbA1c ≥5.4 % for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl and 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, more true-positive cases are identified as compared to currently recommended ADA criteria when both were compared with results of 75 g OGTT. As a screening tool for newly diagnosed pre-diabetes and diabetes, the HbA1c measurement did not perform inferior than FPG. In this study population, FPG and HbA1c values lower than the currently recommended values of ADA were found to be better predictor of pre-diabetes and diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:5
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] HbA1c in type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria: addressing the right questions to move the field forwards
    N. Sattar
    D. Preiss
    Diabetologia, 2012, 55 : 1564 - 1567
  • [32] Predicting steady-state HbA1c responses to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus*
    Kanazu, S.
    Horie, Y.
    Narukawa, M.
    Nonaka, K.
    Taniguchi, T.
    Ferreira, J. C. Arjona
    Takeuchi, M.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (08) : 813 - 818
  • [33] Characterization of left ventricular mass in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes identified by HbA1c levels according to the American Diabetes Association criteria
    Sesti, Giorgio
    Fiorentino, Teresa Vanessa
    Perticone, Maria
    Sciacqua, Angela
    Andreozzi, Francesco
    Hribal, Marta Letizia
    Perticone, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 179 : 211 - 213
  • [34] HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients
    Hjellestad, Iren D.
    Astor, Marianne C.
    Nilsen, Roy M.
    Softeland, Eirik
    Jonung, Torbjorn
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY, 2013, 12
  • [35] HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients
    Iren D Hjellestad
    Marianne C Astor
    Roy M Nilsen
    Eirik Søfteland
    Torbjørn Jonung
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 12
  • [36] The importance of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and postprandial glucose (PPG) control on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Yu, Pan Chang
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Ceriello, Antonio
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 89 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [37] Screening with HbA1c identifies only one in two individuals with diagnosis of prediabetes at oral glucose tolerance test: findings in a real-world Caucasian population
    Chilelli, Nino Cristiano
    Cosma, Chiara
    Ragazzi, Eugenio
    Burlina, Silvia
    Zaninotto, Martina
    Plebani, Mario
    Lapolla, Annunziata
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2014, 51 (05) : 875 - 882
  • [38] Screening with HbA1c identifies only one in two individuals with diagnosis of prediabetes at oral glucose tolerance test: findings in a real-world Caucasian population
    Nino Cristiano Chilelli
    Chiara Cosma
    Eugenio Ragazzi
    Silvia Burlina
    Martina Zaninotto
    Mario Plebani
    Annunziata Lapolla
    Acta Diabetologica, 2014, 51 : 875 - 882
  • [39] Performance of HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a screening tool to diagnose dysglycemic status in high-risk Thai patients
    Yotsapon Thewjitcharoen
    Amia Jones Elizabeth
    Siriwan Butadej
    Soontaree Nakasatien
    Phawinpon Chotwanvirat
    Ekgaluck Wanothayaroj
    Sirinate Krittiyawong
    Tinapa Himathongkam
    Thep Himathongkam
    BMC Endocrine Disorders, 19
  • [40] Performance of HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a screening tool to diagnose dysglycemic status in high-risk Thai patients
    Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon
    Elizabeth, Amia Jones
    Butadej, Siriwan
    Nakasatien, Soontaree
    Chotwanvirat, Phawinpon
    Wanothayaroj, Ekgaluck
    Krittiyawong, Sirinate
    Himathongkam, Tinapa
    Himathongkam, Thep
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2019, 19 (1)