Comparison of HbA1c and FPG as a screening tool for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Indian population

被引:0
|
作者
Rajesh Rajput
Ompal Saini
Meena Rajput
Vijay Shankar
机构
[1] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Endocrinology and Medicine Unit VI
[2] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Community Medicine
[3] Pt. B.D.S. PGIMS,Department of Biochemistry
[4] PGIMS,Department of Endocrinology and Medicine Unit VI
来源
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries | 2015年 / 35卷
关键词
HbA1c; FPG; OGTT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests as a mass screening tool for pre-diabetes and diabetes as defined by standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The study was community-based cross-sectional and carried out in urban field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine at Rohtak. A day before the study, subjects were advised to observe overnight fasting (at least 8 h) and were called at the nearest health center in the morning. Initial evaluation included detailed history and clinical examination to exclude any systemic diseases. FPG and 2-h plasma glucose after 75 g OGTT was used to diagnose pre-diabetes and diabetes in 1008 participant. Fasting plasma glucose and 2-h post glucose load were estimated by glucose oxidase method. HbA1c was measured using Cone lab 30i autoanlyser based on latex agglutination inhibition assay (EIA). The American Diabetic Association (ADA) criteria were used to categorize the subjects into pre-diabetes and diabetes (American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care; 33 Suppl 1:S62–9, 2010). Performance of HbA1c and FPG was evaluated against the results of OGTT by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The prevalence of pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed diabetes was found 20.6 and 12.5 %, respectively. For pre-diabetes, the area under the ROC curve was 0.831 for HbA1c and 0.807 for FPG (p value 0.205), whereas for diabetes, these values were 0.957 for HbA1c and 0.942 for FPG (p value 0.11). At the optimal HbA1c cutoff points of 5.4 % for pre-diabetes and of 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, sensitivities and specificities were 79.02, 79.31 and 94.24, 90.52 %, respectively. Similarly, FPG optimal cutoff points of ≥97 mg/dl for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl for diabetes were found to have maximum sensitivities (specificities) of 93.13 (63.32) and 93.53 (89.64), respectively. It is observed that at optimal cutoff of FPG ≥97 mg/dl and HbA1c ≥5.4 % for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl and 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, more true-positive cases are identified as compared to currently recommended ADA criteria when both were compared with results of 75 g OGTT. As a screening tool for newly diagnosed pre-diabetes and diabetes, the HbA1c measurement did not perform inferior than FPG. In this study population, FPG and HbA1c values lower than the currently recommended values of ADA were found to be better predictor of pre-diabetes and diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:5
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Comparison of HbA1c and FPG as a screening tool for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Indian population
    Rajput, Rajesh
    Saini, Ompal
    Rajput, Meena
    Shankar, Vijay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIABETES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2015, 35 (04) : 559 - 564
  • [2] An Assessment of HbA1c in Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-diabetes Diagnosis: a Multi-centered Data Mining Study
    Muhittin A. Serdar
    Mustafa Serteser
    Yasemin Ucal
    Hande F. Karpuzoglu
    Fehime B. Aksungar
    Abdurrahman Coskun
    Meltem Kilercik
    İbrahim Ünsal
    Aysel Özpınar
    Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2020, 190 : 44 - 56
  • [3] An Assessment of HbA1c in Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-diabetes Diagnosis: a Multi-centered Data Mining Study
    Serdar, Muhittin A.
    Serteser, Mustafa
    Ucal, Yasemin
    Karpuzoglu, Hande F.
    Aksungar, Fehime B.
    Coskun, Abdurrahman
    Kilercik, Meltem
    Unsal, Ibrahim
    Ozpinar, Aysel
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 190 (01) : 44 - 56
  • [4] Pitfalls of HbA1c in the Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Bergman, Michael
    Abdul-Ghani, Muhammad
    Neves, Joao Sergio
    Monteiro, Mariana P.
    Medina, Jose Luiz
    Dorcely, Brenda
    Buysschaert, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (08) : 2803 - 2811
  • [5] Utility of HbA1c for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Rajput, Rajesh
    YogeshYadav
    Rajput, Meena
    Nanda, Smiti
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 98 (01) : 104 - 107
  • [6] The use of HbA1c as an aid in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Sevket, O.
    Sevket, A.
    Ozel, A.
    Dansuk, R.
    Kelekci, S.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (08) : 690 - 692
  • [7] HbA1c as a predictor of diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus
    Claesson, Rickard
    Ignell, Claes
    Shaat, Nael
    Berntorp, Kerstin
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2017, 11 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [8] FASTING PLASMA GLUCOSE AND THE HBA1C ARE NOT OPTIMAL SCREENING MODALITIES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF NEW DIABETES IN PREVIOUSLY UNDIAGNOSED ASIAN INDIAN COMMUNITY PARTICIPANTS
    Prakaschandra, Rosaley
    Naidoo, Datshanna Prakesh
    ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2018, 28 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [9] The utility of HbA1c for screening gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Ye, Min
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Cao, Xiaopei
    Yao, Fengjuan
    Liu, Bin
    Li, Yanbing
    Wang, Zilian
    Xiao, Haipeng
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 114 : 43 - 49
  • [10] Laboratory Assessment of the Diabetes Scenario with Respect to HbA1c and Microalbuminuria
    Poornima, Manjrekar A.
    Shenoy, R.
    Hegde, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (03) : 2489 - 2494