Statin cost effectiveness in primary prevention: A systematic review of the recent cost-effectiveness literature in the United States

被引:33
作者
Aaron P Mitchell
Ross J Simpson
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center, Medical Residency Office, Durham, NC, 27710
[2] Department of Cardiology, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Drug cost; Primary prevention; Statin; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1186/1756-0500-5-373
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The literature on the cost-effectiveness of statin drugs in primary prevention of coronary heart disease is complex. The objective of this study is to compare the disparate results of recent cost-effectiveness analyses of statins. Findings: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on statin cost-effectiveness. The four studies that met inclusion criteria reported varying conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of statin treatment, without a clear consensus as to whether statins are cost-effective for primary prevention. However, after accounting for each studys assumptions about statin costs, we found substantial agreement among the studies. Studies that assumed statins to be more expensive found them to be less cost-effective, and vice-versa. Furthermore, treatment of lowrisk groups became cost-effective as statins became less expensive. Conclusions: Drug price is the primary determinant of statin cost-effectiveness within a given risk group. As more statin drugs become generic, patients at low risk for coronary disease may be treated cost-effectively. Though many factors must be weighed in any medical decision, from a cost-effectiveness perspective, statins may now be considered an appropriate therapy for many patients at low risk for heart disease. © 2012 Mitchell and Simpson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Morrison A., Glassberg H., Determinants of the cost-effectiveness of statins, J Manag Care Pharm, 9, 6, pp. 544-551, (2003)
  • [12] Pletcher M.J., Lazar L., Bibbins-Domingo K., Comparing impact and cost-effectiveness of primary prevention strategies for lipid-lowering, Ann Intern Med, 150, 4, pp. 243-254, (2009)
  • [13] Caro J., Huybrechts K.F., Klittich W.S., Jackson J.D., McGuire A., Allocating funds for cardiovascular disease prevention in light of the NCEP ATP III guidelines, Am J Manag Care, 9, 7, pp. 477-489, (2003)
  • [14] Prosser L.A., Stinnett A.A., Goldman P.A., Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics, Ann Intern Med, 132, 10, pp. 769-779, (2000)
  • [15] Pignone M., Earnshaw S., Tice J.A., Pletcher M.J., Aspirin, statins, or both drugs for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease events in men: A cost-utility analysis, Ann Intern Med, 144, 5, pp. 326-336, (2006)
  • [16] Evans C., Tavakoli M., Crawford B., Use of quality adjusted life years and life years gained as benchmarks in economic evaluations: A critical appraisal, Health Care Manag Sci, 7, 1, pp. 43-49, (2004)
  • [17] Curtiss F.R., Fairman K.A., Tough questions about the value of statin therapy for primary prevention: Did JUPITER miss the moon?, J Manag Care Pharm, 16, 6, pp. 417-423, (2010)
  • [18] Findlay S., The Statin Drugs: Prescription and Price Trends, October 2005 to December 2006, (2007)
  • [19] Wilson P.W., Dagostino R.B., Levy D., Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories, Circulation, 97, 18, pp. 1837-1847, (1998)
  • [20] Grover S.A., Ho V., Lavoie F., The importance of indirect costs in primary cardiovascular disease prevention: Can we save lives and money with statins?, Arch Intern Med, 163, 3, pp. 333-339, (2003)