Comprehensive genomic profiling of inflammatory breast cancer cases reveals a high frequency of clinically relevant genomic alterations

被引:0
|
作者
Jeffrey S. Ross
Siraj M. Ali
Kai Wang
Depinder Khaira
Norma A. Palma
Juliann Chmielecki
Gary A. Palmer
Deborah Morosini
Julia A. Elvin
Sandra V. Fernandez
Vincent A. Miller
Philip J. Stephens
Massimo Cristofanilli
机构
[1] Foundation Medicine,Department of Pathology
[2] Albany Medical College,undefined
[3] Thomas Jefferson University Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2015年 / 154卷
关键词
Inflammatory breast cancer; NGS; Comprehensive genomic profiling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity that carries a worse prognosis relative to non-IBC breast cancer even when matched for standard biomarkers (ER/PR/HER2). The objective of this study was to identify opportunities for benefit from targeted therapy, which are not currently identifiable in the standard workup for advanced breast cancer. Comprehensive genomic profiling on 53 IBC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (mean, 800× + coverage) using the hybrid capture-based FoundationOne assay. Academic and community oncology clinics. From a series of 2208 clinical cases of advanced/refractory invasive breast cancers, 53 cases with IBC were identified. The presence of clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGA) in IBC and responses to targeted therapies. CRGA were defined as genomic alterations (GA) associated with on label targeted therapies and targeted therapies in mechanism-driven clinical trials. For the 44 IBCs with available biomarker data, 19 (39 %) were ER−/PR−/HER2− (triple-negative breast cancer, TNBC). For patients in which the clinical HER2 status was known, 11 (25 %) were HER2+ with complete (100 %) concordance with ERBB2 (HER2) amplification detected by the CGP assay. The 53 sequenced IBC cases harbored a total of 266 GA with an average of 5.0 GA/tumor (range 1–15). At least one alteration associated with an FDA approved therapy or clinical trial was identified in 51/53 (96 %) of cases with an average of 2.6 CRGA/case. The most frequently altered genes were TP53 (62 %), MYC (32 %), PIK3CA (28 %), ERBB2 (26 %), FGFR1 (17 %), BRCA2 (15 %), and PTEN (15 %). In the TNBC subset of IBC, 8/19 (42 %) showed MYC amplification (median copy number 8X, range 7–20) as compared to 9/32 (28 %) in non-TNBC IBC (median copy number 7X, range 6–21). Comprehensive genomic profiling uncovered a high frequency of GA in IBC with 96 % of cases harboring at least 1 CRGA. The clinical benefit of selected targeted therapies in individual IBC cases suggests that a further study of CGP in IBC is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comprehensive genomic profiling can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Drobniene, Monika
    Breimelyte, Dominyka
    Sadzeviciene, Ieva
    Sabaliauskaite, Rasa
    Valkiuniene, Ruta Barbora
    Meskauskas, Raimundas
    Dabkeviciene, Daiva
    Jarmalaite, Sonata
    BREAST, 2025, 80
  • [22] Comprehensive genomic profiling of colorectal cancer patients reveals differences in mutational landscapes among clinical and pathological subgroups
    Li, Peng
    Meng, Qingyu
    Xue, Yonggan
    Teng, Zhipeng
    Chen, Hanlin
    Zhang, Junli
    Xu, Yang
    Wang, Sha
    Yu, Ruoying
    Ou, Qiuxiang
    Wu, Xue
    Jia, Baoqing
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [23] Implementation of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
    Hasson, Shira Peleg
    Hershkovitz, Dov
    Adar, Lyri
    Brezis, Miriam
    Shachar, Eliya
    Aks, Rona
    Galmor, Lee
    Raviv, Yuval
    Ben Neriah, Shira
    Merimsky, Ofer
    Sabo, Edmond
    Wolf, Ido
    Safra, Tamar
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [24] Comprehensive genomic profiling for patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced cancer
    Kondo, Tomohiro
    Matsubara, Junichi
    Pham Nguyen Quy
    Fukuyama, Keita
    Nomura, Motoo
    Funakoshi, Taro
    Doi, Keitaro
    Sakamori, Yuichi
    Yoshioka, Masahiro
    Yokoyama, Akira
    Tamaoki, Masashi
    Kou, Tadayuki
    Hirohashi, Kenshiro
    Yamada, Atsushi
    Yamamoto, Yoshihiro
    Minamiguchi, Sachiko
    Nishigaki, Masakazu
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Kanai, Masashi
    Matsumoto, Shigemi
    Muto, Manabu
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2021, 112 (01) : 296 - 304
  • [25] Breadth versus depth: whole transcriptome sequencing has reduced sensitivity for detection of clinically relevant fusions compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling
    Keller-Evans, Rachel B.
    Munafo, Daniela
    Ross, Tristen
    Rudawsky, Sarah
    Savol, Andrej
    Huang, Richard S. P.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2024, 29 (12): : e1786 - e1789
  • [26] Comparison of the genomic alterations present in tumor samples from patients with metastatic inflammatory versus non-inflammatory breast cancer reveals AURKA as a potential treatment target
    Richard, Francois
    De Schepper, Maxim
    Maetens, Marion
    Leduc, Sophia
    Isnaldi, Edoardo
    Geukens, Tatjana
    Van Baelen, Karen
    Nguyen, Ha-Linh
    Vermeulen, Peter
    Van Laere, Steven
    Bertucci, Francois
    Ueno, Naoto
    Dirix, Luc
    Floris, Giuseppe
    Biganzoli, Elia
    Desmedt, Christine
    BREAST, 2023, 69 : 476 - 480
  • [27] Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling andPD-L1Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers in 312 Patients with Breast Cancer
    Huang, Richard S. P.
    Li, Xinyan
    Haberberger, James
    Sokol, Ethan
    Severson, Eric
    Duncan, Daniel L.
    Hemmerich, Amanda
    Edgerly, Claire
    Williams, Erik
    Elvin, Julia
    Vergilio, Jo-Anne
    Killian, Jonathan Keith
    Lin, Douglas
    Hiemenz, Matthew
    Xiao, Jinpeng
    McEwan, Deborah
    Holmes, Oliver
    Danziger, Natalie
    Erlich, Rachel
    Frampton, Garrett
    Cohen, Michael B.
    McGregor, Kimberly
    Reddy, Prasanth
    Cardeiro, Dawn
    Anhorn, Rachel
    Venstrom, Jeffrey
    Alexander, Brian
    Brown, Charlotte
    Pusztai, Lajos
    Ross, Jeffrey S.
    Ramkissoon, Shakti H.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2020, 25 (11): : 943 - 953
  • [28] Comprehensive genomic profiling of anal squamous cell carcinoma reveals distinct genomically defined classes
    Chung, J. H.
    Sanford, E.
    Johnson, A.
    Klempner, S. J.
    Schrock, A. B.
    Palma, N. A.
    Erlich, R. L.
    Frampton, G. M.
    Chalmers, Z. R.
    Vergilio, J.
    Rubinson, D. A.
    Sun, J. X.
    Chmielecki, J.
    Yelensky, R.
    Suh, J. H.
    Lipson, D.
    George, T. J., Jr.
    Elvin, J. A.
    Stephens, P. J.
    Miller, V. A.
    Ross, J. S.
    Ali, S. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (07) : 1336 - 1341
  • [29] Cancer of unknown primary-Epidemiological trends and relevance of comprehensive genomic profiling
    Binder, Carmen
    Matthes, Katarina Luise
    Korol, Dimitri
    Rohrmann, Sabine
    Moch, Holger
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (09): : 4814 - 4824
  • [30] Comprehensive genomic profiling of recurrent endometrial cancer: Implications for selection of systemic therapy
    Prendergast, Emily N.
    Holman, Laura L.
    Liu, Annie Y.
    Lai, Tiffany S.
    Campos, Maira P.
    Fahey, Jacquline N.
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Abdelaal, Nabilah
    Rao, Jian Yu
    Elvin, Julia A.
    Moore, Kathleen M.
    Konecny, Gottfried E.
    Cohen, Joshua G.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 (03) : 461 - 466