共 1 条
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity score matching, observational study
被引:1
|作者:
Shih, Hong-Mo
[1
,4
]
Lin, Wei-Jun
[1
,4
]
Lin, You-Cian
[3
,4
]
Chang, Shih-Sheng
[2
,4
]
Chang, Kuan-Cheng
[2
,4
]
Yu, Shao-Hua
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, 2 Yue Der Rd, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] China Med Univ Hosp, Surg Dept Cardiovasc Div, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taichung, Taiwan
来源:
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
|
2024年
/
14卷
/
01期
关键词:
SAGNAC;
ROTATION;
VELOCITY;
D O I:
10.1038/s41598-024-60620-7
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly performed as an adjunct to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the specific benefits of ECPR concerning survival with favorable neurological outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the potential advantages of ECPR in the management of refractory OHCA. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involved OHCA patients between January 2016 and May 2021. Patients were categorized into ECPR or CCPR groups. The primary endpoint assessed was survival with favorable neurological outcomes, and the secondary outcome was survival rate. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, with and without 1:2 propensity score matching, were employed to assess ECPR's effect. In total, 1193 patients were included: 85underwent ECPR, and 1108 received CCPR. Compared to the CCPR group, the ECPR group exhibited notably higher survival rate (29.4% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001). The ECPR group also exhibited a higher proportion of survival with favorable neurological outcome than CCPR group (17.6% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ECPR correlated with increased odds of survival with favorable neurological outcome (adjusted odds ratio: 13.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.60-40.06). Following propensity score matching, the ECPR group showed significantly elevated odds of survival with favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio: 13.31; 95% CI 1.61-109.9). This study demonstrated that in comparison to CCPR, ECPR may provide survival benefit and increase the odds of favorable neurological outcomes in selected OHCA patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文