Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

被引:0
作者
Zachary Munn
Micah D. J. Peters
Cindy Stern
Catalin Tufanaru
Alexa McArthur
Edoardo Aromataris
机构
[1] The Joanna Briggs Institute,
[2] The University of Adelaide,undefined
来源
BMC Medical Research Methodology | / 18卷
关键词
Systematic review; Scoping review; Evidence-based healthcare;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 173 条
[11]  
Munn Z(2004)Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews JBI Reports 2 53-150
[12]  
Stern C(2014)The systematic review: an overview AJN The American Journal of Nursing 114 b2700-215
[13]  
Aromataris E(2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ (Clinical research ed) 339 108-156
[14]  
Lockwood C(2014)Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach BMC Med Res Methodol 14 792519-9
[15]  
Jordan Z(2012)Translational science and evidence-based healthcare: a clarification and reconceptualization of how knowledge is generated and used in healthcare Nursing research and practice 2012 91-374
[16]  
Arksey H(2012)Clarifying differences between review designs and methods Systematic Reviews 1 11-168
[17]  
O'Malley L(2009)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies Health Inf Libr J 26 147-51
[18]  
Peters MD(2011)The art and science of knowledge synthesis J Clin Epidemiol 64 1-169
[19]  
Godfrey CM(2011)‘Scoping the scope’ of a cochrane review J Public Health 33 207-4
[20]  
Khalil H(2008)Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services Health Research Policy and Systems 6 92-1030