Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

被引:0
作者
U. Lassen
G. Daugaard
A. Eigtved
L. Højgaard
K. Damgaard
M. Rørth
机构
[1] Rigshospitalet,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center
[2] Hillerød Hospital,Department of Medical Oncology 0862
[3] Rigshospitalet,Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Diagnostic Centre
[4] Rigshospitalet,Department of Radiology
来源
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2003年 / 30卷
关键词
PET; Fluorodeoxyglucose; Germ cell tumours; Staging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Relapse occurs in 30% of patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) within 1 year after orchiectomy. Whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) may detect small metastases when standard staging with computed tomography (CT) and tumour markers is negative. In this study, 46 patients underwent FDG-PET after staging with normal CT and tumour markers. To exclude diagnostic test bias and workup bias, all patients had routine follow-up with repeated CT and tumour marker evaluation, even though the initial FDG-PET was positive. Thirty-six patients have remained disease free with a median follow-up of 48 months (range 24–76). Ten patients (22%) suffered disease relapse after a median of 2 months (range 1–8), and of these, seven had a true positive initial PET with increased uptake of FDG indicating metastatic disease. There were three false negative and no false positive PET scans. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET were 70%, 100% and 93%, respectively. The sensitivity of detecting small retroperitoneal metastases was 88%. The negative and positive predictive values were 92% and 100%, respectively, whereas the negative predictive value of standard staging procedures was 78%. FDG-PET thus seems to be superior to conventional staging (P=0.06) in stage I NSGCT. This non-invasive method may improve the overall management of patients with NSGCT.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Bosl undefined(1996)undefined N Engl J Med 337 242-undefined
  • [2] Peckham undefined(1982)undefined Lancet 2 678-undefined
  • [3] Daugaard undefined(1990)undefined Ann Oncol 1 195-undefined
  • [4] Gels undefined(1995)undefined J Clin Oncol 13 1188-undefined
  • [5] Sogani undefined(1998)undefined J Urol 159 855-undefined
  • [6] Sturgeon undefined(1992)undefined J Clin Oncol 10 564-undefined
  • [7] Donohue undefined(1993)undefined Br J Urol 71 326-undefined
  • [8] Klepp undefined(1990)undefined J Clin Oncol 8 509-undefined
  • [9] Sweeney undefined(2000)undefined J Clin Oncol 18 358-undefined
  • [10] Pont undefined(1996)undefined J Clin Oncol 14 441-undefined