Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma

被引:0
作者
Francesca Aroldi
Mark R. Middleton
机构
[1] The University of Oxford,Department of Oncology
来源
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology | 2022年 / 23卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Increasing knowledge about the biology of melanoma and of immunology has led to the development and regulatory approval of the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, which are indicated for the treatment of melanoma irrespective of the B-Raf proto-oncogene mutation status of the tumour. Only a subset of patients will respond, but those who do can expect long-lasting, previously unheard-of responses. Long-term survival results for the registration trials, including CheckMate 067, Keynote-006, and Keynote-001, have recently been published. In particular, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab showed an impressive 5-year overall survival of just over 50%. However, toxicity remains a significant concern, with some of the side effects being life threatening and/or life changing. In this review, we discuss the safety and efficacy data of all the agents currently approved for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma, identifying factors that influence the choice of a single agent rather than combination therapy. We highlight the potential biomarkers of response, effects of long-term toxicity, and options after progression.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 338
页数:7
相关论文
共 354 条
  • [21] Lawrence DP(2016)Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial Lancet Oncol 17 375-654
  • [22] Wolchok JD(2015)Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 16 3937-1477
  • [23] Kluger H(2020)Five-year outcomes with nivolumab in patients with wild-type BRAF advanced melanoma J Clin Oncol 38 4429-233
  • [24] Callahan MK(2020)KEYNOTE-716: phase III study of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage II melanoma Future Oncol 16 643-1550
  • [25] Postow MA(2021)Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 22 1465-1833
  • [26] Rizvi NA(2020)Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 21 225-2426
  • [27] Lesokhin AM(2021)Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma Eur J Cancer. 158 1540-1241
  • [28] Callahan MK(2016)Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 387 1823-3060
  • [29] Kluger H(2016)Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 375 2415-5074
  • [30] Postow MA(2017)First-line nivolumab in stage IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 376 1236-571