Immunological Mechanism of Action and Clinical Profile of Disease-Modifying Treatments in Multiple Sclerosis

被引:0
作者
Renaud A. Du Pasquier
Daniel D. Pinschewer
Doron Merkler
机构
[1] Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois,Service de Neurologie, Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, BT
[2] University of Basel,06
[3] Geneva University Hospital,Division of Experimental Virology, Department of Biomedicine
[4] University of Geneva,Division of Clinical Pathology
[5] University Medical Center Göttingen,Department of Pathology and Immunology
来源
CNS Drugs | 2014年 / 28卷
关键词
Multiple Sclerosis; Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis; Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy; Alemtuzumab; Natalizumab;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a life-long, potentially debilitating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS is considered to be an immune-mediated disease, and the presence of autoreactive peripheral lymphocytes in CNS compartments is believed to be critical in the process of demyelination and tissue damage in MS. Although MS is not currently a curable disease, several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are now available, or are in development. These DMTs are all thought to primarily suppress autoimmune activity within the CNS. Each therapy has its own mechanism of action (MoA) and, as a consequence, each has a different efficacy and safety profile. Neurologists can now select therapies on a more individual, patient-tailored basis, with the aim of maximizing potential for long-term efficacy without interruptions in treatment. The MoA and clinical profile of MS therapies are important considerations when making that choice or when switching therapies due to suboptimal disease response. This article therefore reviews the known and putative immunological MoAs alongside a summary of the clinical profile of therapies approved for relapsing forms of MS, and those in late-stage development, based on published data from pivotal randomized, controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 558
页数:23
相关论文
共 706 条
[1]  
Compston A(2008)Multiple sclerosis Lancet 372 1502-1517
[2]  
Coles A(2006)Multiple sclerosis—the plaque and its pathogenesis N Engl J Med 354 942-955
[3]  
Frohman EM(2007)Inflammation, demyelination, neurodegeneration and neuroprotection in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis J Neuroimmunol 184 37-44
[4]  
Racke MK(2007)Multiple sclerosis: a battle between destruction and repair J Neurochem 100 295-306
[5]  
Raine CS(2013)Assessing risks of multiple sclerosis therapies J Neurol Sci 332 59-65
[6]  
Peterson LK(2012)What do effective treatments for multiple sclerosis tell us about the molecular mechanisms involved in pathogenesis? Int J Mol Sci 13 12665-12709
[7]  
Fujinami RS(2011)Type I interferon inhibits interleukin-1 production and inflammasome activation Immunity 34 213-223
[8]  
McQualter JL(2005)Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection J Exp Med 202 637-650
[9]  
Bernard CC(1983)Immunohistological analysis of T lymphocyte subsets in the central nervous system in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis J Neurol Sci 62 219-232
[10]  
Parfenov V(2002)Acute axonal damage in multiple sclerosis is most extensive in early disease stages and decreases over time Brain 125 2202-2212