Evaluating Strategies for Negotiating Workers’ Rights in Transnational Corporations: The Effects of Codes of Conduct and Global Agreements on Workplace Democracy

被引:0
作者
Niklas Egels-Zandén
Peter Hyllman
机构
[1] Economics and Law at Göteborg University,Centre for Business in Society, School of Business
[2] Stockholm School of Economics,Centre for People and Organization
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2007年 / 76卷
关键词
code of conduct; corporate responsibility; global agreement; international framework agreement; labour practice; non-governmental organisation; transnational corporation; union; workplace democracy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Following the offshoring of production to developing countries by transnational corporations (TNCs), unions and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have criticised working conditions at TNCs’ offshore factories. This has led to the emergence of two different approaches to operationalising TNC responsibilities for workers’ rights in developing countries: codes of conduct and global agreements. Despite the importance of this development, few studies have systematically compared the effects of these two different ways of dealing with workers’ rights. This article addresses this gap by analysing how codes of conduct and global agreements both independently and interactively affect workers’ rights. We do this based on a qualitative study of the Sri Lankan operations of a Swedish TNC in Sri␣Lanka, and on interviews with union and NGO representatives actively involved in codes of conduct and global agreements. Our results indicate that global agreements independently address all the aspects included in codes of conduct, while also addressing additional, more process-oriented aspects of workers’ rights. Hence, on their own, global agreements seem to comprise the superior approach to promoting workers’ rights. Furthermore, our results indicate that promoting codes of conduct has negative interactive effects on global agreements. Based on these results, we argue that the current focus on codes of conduct is counterproductive for the promotion of workers’ rights.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 223
页数:16
相关论文
共 109 条
[31]  
Thompson P.(2002)Sourcing Ethics in the Textile Sector: The Case of C&A Business Ethics: A European Review 11 167-178
[32]  
Diller J.(2004)European vs. American Approaches to Institutionalization of Business Ethics: The Spanish Case Development in Practice 14 158-162
[33]  
Eade D.(1999)Beyond the Barriers: New Forms of Labour Internationalism International Trade Journal 13 157-185
[34]  
Eaton A. E.(2002)Advantages of Sourcing Apparel from China, Taiwan, South Korea and Mexico Journal of Business Ethics 39 117-124
[35]  
Egels-Zandén N.(2005)The Establishment and Enforcement of Codes Journal of American Academy of Business 6 91-97
[36]  
Hyllman P.(2003)The Transnational Corporation, Corporate Social Responsibility and the ‚Outsourcing’ Debate Labour Education 130 1-13
[37]  
Emmelhainz M. A.(2004)Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges and Opportunities for Trade Unionists Journal of Business Ethics 50 13-31
[38]  
Adams R. J.(2001)Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics 34 161-173
[39]  
Fairbrother P.(2002a)Business Approaches to Combating Bribery: A Study of Codes of Conduct Journal of Business Ethics 36 291-301
[40]  
Hammer N.(2002b)Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business and Stakeholder Codes European Management Journal 20 260-271