Evaluating Strategies for Negotiating Workers’ Rights in Transnational Corporations: The Effects of Codes of Conduct and Global Agreements on Workplace Democracy

被引:0
作者
Niklas Egels-Zandén
Peter Hyllman
机构
[1] Economics and Law at Göteborg University,Centre for Business in Society, School of Business
[2] Stockholm School of Economics,Centre for People and Organization
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2007年 / 76卷
关键词
code of conduct; corporate responsibility; global agreement; international framework agreement; labour practice; non-governmental organisation; transnational corporation; union; workplace democracy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Following the offshoring of production to developing countries by transnational corporations (TNCs), unions and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have criticised working conditions at TNCs’ offshore factories. This has led to the emergence of two different approaches to operationalising TNC responsibilities for workers’ rights in developing countries: codes of conduct and global agreements. Despite the importance of this development, few studies have systematically compared the effects of these two different ways of dealing with workers’ rights. This article addresses this gap by analysing how codes of conduct and global agreements both independently and interactively affect workers’ rights. We do this based on a qualitative study of the Sri Lankan operations of a Swedish TNC in Sri␣Lanka, and on interviews with union and NGO representatives actively involved in codes of conduct and global agreements. Our results indicate that global agreements independently address all the aspects included in codes of conduct, while also addressing additional, more process-oriented aspects of workers’ rights. Hence, on their own, global agreements seem to comprise the superior approach to promoting workers’ rights. Furthermore, our results indicate that promoting codes of conduct has negative interactive effects on global agreements. Based on these results, we argue that the current focus on codes of conduct is counterproductive for the promotion of workers’ rights.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 223
页数:16
相关论文
共 109 条
[11]  
Braun R.(2000)Globalization, China’s Free (Read Bonded) Labour Market, and the Chinese Trade Unions Asia Pacific Business Review 6 260-281
[12]  
Gearhart J.(2003)Racing to the Bottom: International Trade without a Social Clause Third World Quarterly 24 1011-1028
[13]  
Broadhurst A.(1997)China’s Troubled Workers Foreign Affairs 76 104-117
[14]  
Carley M.(1995)Global and Local Subcontracting: Space, Ethnicity, and the Organization of Apparel Production World Development 23 1363-1374
[15]  
Carasco E.(2004)Trade Unions, NGOs, and Corporate Codes of Conduct Development in Practice 14 210-215
[16]  
Singh J.(2004)Time to Scale Up Cooperation? Trade Unions, NGOs, and the International Anti-Sweatshop Movement Development in Practice 14 61-70
[17]  
Cassell C.(2000)Do Codes Make a Difference? The Case of Bank Lending and the Environment Journal of Business Ethics 24 165-178
[18]  
Johnson P.(1999)A Social Conscience in the Global Marketplace? Labour Dimensions of Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Investor Initiatives International Labour Review 138 99-129
[19]  
Smith K.(2004)Editorial Overview Development in Practice 14 5-12
[20]  
Chan A.(1990)The Extent and Determinants of Local Union Control of Participative Programs Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 604-620