Evaluating Strategies for Negotiating Workers’ Rights in Transnational Corporations: The Effects of Codes of Conduct and Global Agreements on Workplace Democracy

被引:0
作者
Niklas Egels-Zandén
Peter Hyllman
机构
[1] Economics and Law at Göteborg University,Centre for Business in Society, School of Business
[2] Stockholm School of Economics,Centre for People and Organization
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2007年 / 76卷
关键词
code of conduct; corporate responsibility; global agreement; international framework agreement; labour practice; non-governmental organisation; transnational corporation; union; workplace democracy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Following the offshoring of production to developing countries by transnational corporations (TNCs), unions and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have criticised working conditions at TNCs’ offshore factories. This has led to the emergence of two different approaches to operationalising TNC responsibilities for workers’ rights in developing countries: codes of conduct and global agreements. Despite the importance of this development, few studies have systematically compared the effects of these two different ways of dealing with workers’ rights. This article addresses this gap by analysing how codes of conduct and global agreements both independently and interactively affect workers’ rights. We do this based on a qualitative study of the Sri Lankan operations of a Swedish TNC in Sri␣Lanka, and on interviews with union and NGO representatives actively involved in codes of conduct and global agreements. Our results indicate that global agreements independently address all the aspects included in codes of conduct, while also addressing additional, more process-oriented aspects of workers’ rights. Hence, on their own, global agreements seem to comprise the superior approach to promoting workers’ rights. Furthermore, our results indicate that promoting codes of conduct has negative interactive effects on global agreements. Based on these results, we argue that the current focus on codes of conduct is counterproductive for the promotion of workers’ rights.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 223
页数:16
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Anner M.(2006)The Industrial Determinants of Transnational Solidarity: Global Interunion Politics in Three Sectors European Journal of Industrial Relations 12 7-27
[2]  
Greer I.(2005)Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility: A Tri-Dimensional Approach to International CSR Research Business Ethics Quarterly 15 1-22
[3]  
Hauptmeier M.(1976)Necessary Elements for Effective Worker Participation in Decision-Making Journal of␣Economic Issues 10 490-522
[4]  
Lillie N.(2004)The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three-Country Comparative Study Business and Society Review 109 449-477
[5]  
Winchester N.(2004)Who Should Code Your Conduct? Trade Union and NGO Differences in the Fight for Workers’ Rights Development in Practice 14 183-196
[6]  
Arthaud-Day M. L.(2000)Corporations and the Ethics of Social Responsibility: An Emerging Regime of Expansion and Compliance Business Ethics: A European Review 9 86-98
[7]  
Bernstein P.(2005)Global Agreements – State of Play European Industrial Relations Review 381 14-18
[8]  
Bondy K.(2003)The Content and Focus of the Codes of Ethics of the World’s Largest Transnational Corporations Business and Society Review 108 71-94
[9]  
Matten D.(1997)Opening the Black Box: Corporate Codes of Ethics in Their Organizational Context Journal of Business Ethics 16 1077-1093
[10]  
Moon J.(1998)Labor Standards and Human Rights: The Case of Chinese Workers Under Market Socialism Human Rights Quarterly 20 886-904