The Effects of Cultural Diversity in Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams

被引:0
作者
D. Sandy Staples
Lina Zhao
机构
[1] Queen's University,Queen's School of Business
来源
Group Decision and Negotiation | 2006年 / 15卷
关键词
team diversity; virtual teams; cultural diversity; national culture; experiment; survival task; reductive capabilities of collaborative technologies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diversity in the national background and culture of team members is common in virtual teams. An experimental study, with short term teams, was undertaken to examine the effect of cultural diversity on team effectiveness and to examine if this effect changes depending if the team worked face-to-face (F2F) or virtually. Heterogeneous teams were created that had greater diversity than homogeneous teams of individualism/collectivism values, different languages spoken, country of birth, and nationality. The teams worked on a desert survival task either F2F or virtually (via audioconference and electronic chat tools). The overall results indicated that heterogeneous teams were less satisfied and cohesive and had more conflict than the homogeneous teams, although there were no statistical differences in team performance levels. However, examining just the heterogeneous teams found that the performance of the virtual heterogeneous teams was superior to that of the F2F heterogeneous teams. The results support Carte and Chidambaram's (2004) theory that the reductive capabilities of collaborative technologies are beneficial for newly-formed diverse teams.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 406
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Baltes B. B.(2002)Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 156-179
  • [2] Dickson M.W.(1988)Finding Universal Dimensions of Variation in Multicultural Studies of Values: The Rokeach and Chinese Value Surveys Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 1009-1015
  • [3] Sherman M.P.(1987)Improving Group Performance by Training in Individual Problem Solving Journal of Applied Psychology 72 651-657
  • [4] Bauer C.C.(2004)A Capabilities-Based Theory of Technology Deployment in Diverse Teams: Leapfrogging the Pitfalls of Diversity and Leveraging its Potential With Collaborative Technology Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 448-471
  • [5] LaGanke J.S.(1989)Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China Administrative Science Quarterly 34 565-581
  • [6] Bond M.H.(2000)Creating Hybrid Team Cultures: An Empirical Test of Transnational Team Functioning Academy of Management Journal 43 26-49
  • [7] Bottger P. C.(2003)The Management of Distributed Projects Across Cultures Journal of Global Information Management 11 58-70
  • [8] Yetton P.W.(1980)The Effects of Three Social Decision Schemes on Decision Group Process Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25 97-106
  • [9] Carte T.(1998)When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications Organization Studies 19 181-205
  • [10] Chidambaram L.(1998)Inspecting the Emperor's Clothes: Evidence that Random Selection of Leaders can Enhance Group Performance Group Dynamics 2 168-184