Improved production of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter europaeus employing fruit extract as carbon source

被引:0
作者
Yi Sheng Tseng
Anil Kumar Patel
Chiu-Wen Chen
Cheng-Di Dong
Reeta Rani Singhania
机构
[1] National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology,Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
[2] National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology,Department of Marine Environmental Engineering
[3] National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology,Sustainable Environment Research Center
来源
Journal of Food Science and Technology | 2023年 / 60卷
关键词
Bacterial cellulose; Bioprocess; Carbon source; Biorefinery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bacterial cellulose (BC) has attracted worldwide attention owing to its tremendous properties and versatile applications. BC has huge market demand, however; its production is still limited hence important to explore the economically and technically feasible bioprocess for its improved production. The current study is based on improving the bioprocess for BC production employing Komagataeibacter europeaus 14148. Physico-chemical parameters have been optimized e.g., initial pH, incubation temperature, incubation period, inoculum size, and carbon source for maximum BC production. The study employed crude and/or a defined carbon source in the production medium. Hestrin and Schramm (HS) medium was used for BC production with initial pH 5.5 at 30 °C after 7 days of incubation under static conditions. The yield of BC obtained from fruit juice extracted from orange, papaya, mango and banana were higher than other sugars employed. The maximum BC yield of 3.48 ± 0.16 g/L was obtained with papaya extract having 40 g/L reducing sugar concentration and 3.47 ± 0.05 g/L BC was obtained with orange extract having 40 g/L reducing sugar equivalent in the medium. BC yield was about three-fold higher than standard HS medium. Fruit extracts can be employed as sustainable and economic substrates for BC production to replace glucose and fructose.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1064
页数:10
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]  
Arserim-Uçar DK(2021)Characterization of bacterial cellulose nanocrystals: effect of acid treatments and neutralization Food Chem 336 127597-106
[2]  
Korel F(2021)Fresh oil palm frond juice as a novel and alternative fermentation medium for bacterial cellulose production Mater Today: Proceed 42 101-911
[3]  
Liu LS(2020)Bacterial cellulose production from biodiesel-derived crude glycerol, magnetic functionalization, and its application as carrier for lipase immobilization Int J Biol Macromol 153 902-60
[4]  
Yam KL(2017)From rotten grapes to industrial exploitation: Int J Biol Macromol 96 52-80
[5]  
Azmi SNNS(2018) SGP37, a micro-factory for macroscale production of bacterial nanocellulose Bioresour Technol 247 73-2175
[6]  
Fabli SNNFM(2019)Biotransformation of sweet lime pulp waste into high-quality nanocellulose with an excellent productivity using Waste Biomass Valorization 10 2165-352
[7]  
Aris FAF(2020) SGP37 under static intermittent fed-bach cultivation Carbohydr Res 493 108030-033
[8]  
SamsuAsnawiYusofAriffinAbdullah Z’AASFMYMHSSS(1954)Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose from citrus peels Biochem J 58 345-188
[9]  
Dikshit PK(2013)Novel bacterial cellulose membrane biosynthesized by a new and highly efficient producer J Microb Biochem 5 031-1173
[10]  
Kim BS(1999) TJPU03 J Biosci Bioeng 88 183-304