Reference materials for large-scale metal deposition surveys

被引:0
|
作者
Eiliv Steinnes
Åke Rühling
Harri Lippo
Ahti Mäkinen
机构
[1] Department of Chemistry,
[2] Norwegian University of Science and Technology,undefined
[3] N-7034 Trondheim,undefined
[4] Norway,undefined
[5] IVL/Deparment of Ecology,undefined
[6] Ecology Building,undefined
[7] S-223 62 Lund,undefined
[8] Sweden,undefined
[9] The Finnish Forest Research Institute,undefined
[10] Muhos Research Station,undefined
[11] FIN-91500 Muhos,undefined
[12] Finland,undefined
[13] Department of Ecology and Systematics,undefined
[14] Laboratories of Ecology,undefined
[15] PB 7,undefined
[16] FIN-00014 University of Helsinki,undefined
[17] Finland,undefined
来源
关键词
Key words Analytical quality control; Reference materials; Moss; Organic surface soil; Intercalibration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 In order to ensure quality assurance in large-scale environmental contamination studies involving many different analytical laboratories, the use of calibrated reference materials is essential. Prior to a survey of atmospheric metal deposition in 1995 comprising 20 countries and covering large parts of Europe, the lack of suitable reference materials of moss and organic-rich soil was apparent. In order to improve the quality of analytical data to be produced in this international survey, candidate analytical laboratories were invited to participate in an intercomparison exercise. Three moss and three soil humus reference samples specifically prepared for this purpose were distributed anonymously among the laboratories, which were asked to report data for ten priority elements (V, Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, Hg, Pb) and as many additional elements as they determined normally. In this paper the analytical data from the intercomparison are evaluated, and recommended values for the ten priority elements and 17 additional elements (B, Na, Mg, Al, S, K, Ca, Mn, Co, Se, Rb, Sr, Sb, Cs, Ba, La, Th) in each of the six reference samples are established. These samples should be useful for similar future studies including areas where the contamination levels are very low.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnification and evolution biases in large-scale structure surveys
    Maartens, Roy
    Fonseca, Jose
    Camera, Stefano
    Jolicoeur, Sheean
    Viljoen, Jan-Albert
    Clarkson, Chris
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2021, (12):
  • [22] Classical Pulsators in Large-Scale Optical Photometric Surveys
    Soszynski, Igor
    RR LYRAE 2017 CONFERENCE - REVIVAL OF THE CLASSICAL PULSATORS: FROM GALACTIC STRUCTURE TO STELLAR INTERIOR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 6 : 29 - 36
  • [23] RESPONDENT EGO-INVOLVEMENT IN LARGE-SCALE SURVEYS
    GREENBERG, AL
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1956, 20 (04) : 390 - 393
  • [24] LARGE-SCALE SOCIAL SURVEYS - PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTS
    FIENBERG, SE
    TANUR, JM
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1983, 28 (02): : 135 - 153
  • [25] Dark energy, α-attractors, and large-scale structure surveys
    Akrami, Yashar
    Kallosh, Renata
    Linde, Andrei
    Vardanyan, Valeri
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2018, (06):
  • [26] Sufficient observables for large-scale structure in galaxy surveys
    Carron, J.
    Szapudi, I.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 439 (01) : L11 - L15
  • [27] CLASS OF ROBUST SAMPLING DESIGNS FOR LARGE-SCALE SURVEYS
    BREWER, KRW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) : 911 - 915
  • [28] Large-scale systematic signals in weak lensing surveys
    Vale, C
    Hoekstra, H
    van Waerbeke, L
    White, M
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 613 (01): : L1 - L4
  • [29] Minimizing the stochasticity of halos in large-scale structure surveys
    Hamaus, Nico
    Seljak, Uros
    Desjacques, Vincent
    Smith, Robert E.
    Baldauf, Tobias
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2010, 82 (04):
  • [30] Interloper bias in future large-scale structure surveys
    Pullen, Anthony R.
    Hirata, Christopher M.
    Dore, Olivier
    Raccanelli, Alvise
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2016, 68 (01)