Uncertainty-Based Multi-Objective Decision Making with Hierarchical Reliability Analysis Under Water Resources and Environmental Constraints

被引:0
作者
Feifei Dong
Yong Liu
Han Su
Zhongyao Liang
Rui Zou
Huaicheng Guo
机构
[1] Peking University,College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences (MOE)
[2] Tetra Tech,undefined
[3] Inc,undefined
[4] Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pollution Process and Management of Plateau Lake-Watershed,undefined
来源
Water Resources Management | 2016年 / 30卷
关键词
Water resources allocation; Stochastic programming; Tradeoff analysis; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm; Optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rapid urbanization and population growth have resulted in worldwide serious water shortage and environmental deterioration. It is then essential for efficient and feasible allocation of scarce water and environment resources to the competing users. Due to inherent uncertainties, decision making for resources allocation is vulnerable to failure. The scheme feasibility can be evaluated by reliability, representing the failure probability. A progressive reliability-oriented multi-objective (PROMO) optimal decision-making procedure is proposed in this study to deal with problems with numerous reliability objectives. Dimensionality of the objectives is reduced by a top-down hierarchical reliability analysis (HRA) process combining optimization with evaluation. Pareto solutions of the reformulated model, representing alternative schemes non-dominated with each other, are generated by a metalmodel-based optimization algorithm. Evaluation and identification of Pareto solutions are conducted by multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The PROMO procedure is demonstrated for a case study on industrial structure transformation under strict constraints of water resources and total environmental emissions amounts in Guangzhou City, South China. The Pareto front reveals tradeoffs between economic returns of the industries and system reliability. For different reliability preference scenarios, the Pareto solutions are ranked and the top-rated one was recommended for implementation. The model results indicate that the PROMO procedure is effective for model solving and scheme selection of uncertainty-based multi-objective decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 822
页数:17
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Andreu J(1996)AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management J Hydrol 177 269-291
[2]  
Capilla J(1974)Chance-constrained dynamic programing and the optimization of water resource systems Water Resour Res 10 1099-541
[3]  
Sanchís E(2009)Stochastic sampling design using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and adaptive neural networks Environ Model Softw 24 530-27
[4]  
Askew AJ(1989)Solution of a class of stochastic linear-convex control problems using deterministic equivalents J Optimiz Theory App 62 17-184
[5]  
Behzadian K(1975)The construction and implementation of metamodels Simulation 24 177-61
[6]  
Kapelan Z(2009)Multicriteria decision making (MCDM): a framework for research and applications Comput Intelligence Magazine, IEEE 4 48-79
[7]  
Savic D(2007)Improving hypervolume-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms by using objective reduction methods IEEE 6 73-308
[8]  
Ardeshir A(1959)Chance-constrained programming Manage Sci 1 269-336
[9]  
Bes C(1999)A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques Knowl Inf Syst 86 331-48
[10]  
Sethi S(2010)Study on the total water pollutant load allocation in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) Estuary and adjacent seawater area Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 515–516 39-342