Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI

被引:24
作者
Alvarez, Jose M. [1 ,2 ]
Colmenarejo, Alejandra Bringas [3 ]
Elobaid, Alaa [4 ,5 ]
Fabbrizzi, Simone [4 ,6 ,7 ]
Fahimi, Miriam [8 ]
Ferrara, Antonio [9 ,10 ]
Ghodsi, Siamak [5 ,6 ]
Mougan, Carlos [3 ]
Papageorgiou, Ioanna [6 ]
Reyero, Paula [11 ]
Russo, Mayra [6 ]
Scott, Kristen M. [12 ]
State, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xuan [13 ]
Ruggieri, Salvatore [2 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Normale Super Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton, England
[4] CERTH, Thessaloniki, Greece
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[6] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Hannover, Germany
[7] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
[8] Univ Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
[9] GESIS Leibniz Inst, Mannheim, Germany
[10] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
[11] Open Univ, Milton Keynes, England
[12] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[13] SCHUFA Holding AG, Wiesbaden, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Bias; Fairness; Policy advice; Best practices; ALGORITHMIC FAIRNESS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; DISCRIMINATION; IMPACT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-024-09746-w
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The literature addressing bias and fairness in AI models (fair-AI) is growing at a fast pace, making it difficult for novel researchers and practitioners to have a bird's-eye view picture of the field. In particular, many policy initiatives, standards, and best practices in fair-AI have been proposed for setting principles, procedures, and knowledge bases to guide and operationalize the management of bias and fairness. The first objective of this paper is to concisely survey the state-of-the-art of fair-AI methods and resources, and the main policies on bias in AI, with the aim of providing such a bird's-eye guidance for both researchers and practitioners. The second objective of the paper is to contribute to the policy advice and best practices state-of-the-art by leveraging from the results of the NoBIAS research project. We present and discuss a few relevant topics organized around the NoBIAS architecture, which is made up of a Legal Layer, focusing on the European Union context, and a Bias Management Layer, focusing on understanding, mitigating, and accounting for bias.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 315 条
[151]  
Kahneman D, 2021, Noise: A flaw in human judgment
[152]  
Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux
[153]  
Kamiran F, 2009, 2009 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION, P337
[154]  
Kamishima Toshihiro, 2012, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Proceedings of the European Conference (ECML PKDD 2012), P35, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33486-3_3
[155]   A Survey of Algorithmic Recourse: Contrastive Explanations and Consequential Recommendations [J].
Karimi, Amir-Hossein ;
Barthe, Gilles ;
Schoelkopf, Bernhard ;
Valera, Isabel .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2023, 55 (05)
[156]   The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning [J].
Kasirzadeh, Atoosa ;
Smart, Andrew .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, :228-236
[157]  
Katell M, 2019, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1912.02943
[158]   Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review [J].
Kaur, Davinder ;
Uslu, Suleyman ;
Rittichier, Kaley J. ;
Durresi, Arjan .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2023, 55 (02)
[159]   Systematizing Audit in Algorithmic Recruitment [J].
Kazim, Emre ;
Koshiyama, Adriano Soares ;
Hilliard, Airlie ;
Polle, Roseline .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 9 (03)
[160]  
Keane M.T., 2021, If only we had better counterfactual explanations: Five key deficits to rectify in the evaluation of counterfactual XAI techniques, P4466