Pond construction for threatened amphibians is an important conservation tool, even in landscapes with extant natural water bodies

被引:0
作者
Riin Magnus
Riinu Rannap
机构
[1] University of Tartu,Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences
[2] University of Tartu,Department of Semiotics, Institute of Philosophy and Semiotics
来源
Wetlands Ecology and Management | 2019年 / 27卷
关键词
Amphibian diversity; Breeding pond selection; Breeding pond characteristics; Estonia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ponds—small, isolated freshwater bodies—have vanished in large numbers during the last decades. Despite such great loss, the number of natural small water bodies has still remained quite high in Estonia. Nevertheless, many pond-related species, including amphibians such as the northern crested newt Triturus cristatus and the common spadefoot toad Pelobates fuscus—are in decline in Estonia, suggesting that the conditions of extant natural ponds might not be optimal. However, these conditions have never been examined. To halt the decline of these two pond-breeding species, more than 400 ponds have been constructed or restored from 2004 to 2014 in Estonia. In this study we compared 85 natural and 85 constructed ponds (which were created or restored especially for T. cristatus and/or P. fuscus) to find out: (i) what the main differences are between natural ponds and ponds specially created for threatened species; (ii) whether natural ponds provide breeding conditions for local amphibians; (iii) given the decline of T. cristatus and P. fuscus, what are the characteristics lacking in natural ponds, due to which they are not providing quality breeding habitats for these species. Whereas the constructed ponds were located in open habitats with mineral soils, the natural ponds were mainly in mires and forests, being thus more shaded. Amphibian diversity was higher in the constructed ponds and was positively related to the depth of the pond, the clarity of the water, the presence of slanting slopes, the absence of fish and the presence of nearby fields. T. cristatus preferred constructed ponds for reproduction, while the breeding site selection of P. fuscus was determined mainly by terrestrial habitat characteristics. Importantly, when the threatened species were removed from the sample, the diversity of common amphibians did not differ between natural and constructed ponds, suggesting that in our study sites natural water bodies act still as breeding sites for common species, but not for threatened ones. We conclude that pond construction is an important tool to halt the decline of threatened species, even in landscapes where natural ponds are still preserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 341
页数:18
相关论文
共 282 条
[1]  
Beebee TJC(1977)Habitats of the British Amphibians (1): chalk uplands Biol Conserv 12 279-293
[2]  
Beebee TJC(2005)The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biol Conserv 125 271-285
[3]  
Griffiths RA(2003)Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians Biol Conserv 114 317-326
[4]  
Beja P(2017)The importance of small waterbodies for biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for policy makers Hydrobiologia 793 3-39
[5]  
Alcazar R(2002)Environmental issues in lakes and ponds: current state and perspectives Environ Conserv 29 290-307
[6]  
Biggs L(2012)A place to call home: amphibian use of created and restored wetlands Int J Ecol 38 451-459
[7]  
von Fumetti S(2018)Comparative macrophyte diversity of waterbodies in the central European landscape Wetlands 64 23-35
[8]  
Kelly-Quinn M(2011)AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioural ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23 70-81
[9]  
Brönmark C(2003)Evaluating vernal pools as a basis for conservation strategies: a Maine case study Wetlands 69 64-75
[10]  
Hansson LA(2010)Biological diversity of copepods and cladocerans in Mediterranean temporary ponds under periods of contrasting rainfall J Limnol 9 51-59