Profiles of monograph authors in the social sciences and humanities: an analysis of productivity, career stage, co-authorship, disciplinary affiliation and gender, based on a regional bibliographic database

被引:0
作者
Frederik T. Verleysen
Truyken L. B. Ossenblok
机构
[1] University of Antwerp,Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Faculty of Social Sciences
来源
Scientometrics | 2017年 / 111卷
关键词
Social sciences and humanities; Books; Disciplinary affiliation; Career-stage; Gender; Co-authorship; Productivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scholarly monograph authors are compared to other authors, based on bibliographic data registered in the VABB-SHW database from Flanders (Belgium). Monograph authors are found to be most often established male researchers with high productivity, who are relatively less involved in research collaboration (co-authored publications) than are other authors. There exists a clear divergence between most of the individual social science disciplines, where monograph authors make up a marginal share of all authors, and several humanities disciplines where shares are up to one fifth. Relatively more female and non-established authors publish monographs in the humanities compared to the social sciences. A statistical comparison of productivity points to diverging publication patterns in Flemish SSH research: the group of most productive authors counts both monograph authors who also rely on other book publication types, and other authors who publish mostly journal articles.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1686
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Borghart P(2013)A label for peer-reviewed books Learned Publishing 26 167-171
[2]  
Cronin B(2004)Mickey Mouse and Milton: Book publishing in the humanities Learned Publishing 17 85-98
[3]  
La Barre K(2012)Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009 Scientometrics 93 373-390
[4]  
Engels TCE(2016)Taking scholarly books into account. Current developments in five European countries Scientometrics 22 64-77
[5]  
Ossenblok TLB(2013)Evaluation of scientific books’ publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey Research Evaluation 64 1388-1398
[6]  
Spruyt EHJ(2013)Opportunities and limitations of the Book Citation Index Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 24 63-77
[7]  
Giménez-Toledo E(2015)Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms and individual working routines in the faculty of arts at Uppsala University Research Evaluation 26 724-736
[8]  
Manana-Rodriguez J(2015)Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: books and non-standard outputs El professional de la informacion 62 2147-2164
[9]  
Engels TCE(2011)Assessing the citation impact of books: the role of Google books, Google Scholar, and Scopus Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1 28-34
[10]  
Ingwersen P(2012)Edited volumes, monographs and book chapters in the Book Citation Index (BKCI) and Science Citation Index (SCI, SoSCI, A&HCI) Journal of Scientometric Research 21 280-290