Endoscopic Treatment of Weight Regain Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
Pichamol Jirapinyo
Diogo Turiani H. de Moura
Ossamu Okazaki
Wanderley M. Bernardo
Manoel Galvão Neto
Josemberg Marins Campos
Marco Aurélio Santo
Eduardo G. H. de Moura
机构
[1] University of São Paulo Medical School,Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas
[2] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Surgery
[3] Harvard Medical School,Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Hospital das Clinicas
[4] Unit of Endoscopy—Gastro Obeso Center,undefined
[5] Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE),undefined
[6] University of Sao Paulo Medical School,undefined
来源
Obesity Surgery | 2018年 / 28卷
关键词
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Bariatrics; Bariatric surgery; Weight regain; Endoscopy; Endoscopic suturing; Obesity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure. Despite its high efficacy, some patients regain part of their lost weight. Several endoscopic therapies have been introduced as alternatives to treat weight regain, but most of the articles are relatively small with unclear long-term data. To systematically assess the efficacy of endoscopic therapies for weight regain after RYGB. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, OVID, CINAHL/EBSCo, LILACS/Bireme, and gray literature. Primary outcomes were absolute weight loss (AWL), excess weight loss (EWL), and total body weight loss (TBWL). Thirty-two studies were included in qualitative analysis. Twenty-six described full-thickness (FT) endoscopic suturing and pooled AWL, EWL, and TBWL at 3 months were 8.5 ± 2.9 kg, 21.6 ± 9.3%, and 7.3 ± 2.6%, respectively. At 6 months, they were 8.6 ± 3.5 kg, 23.7 ± 12.3%, and 8.0 ± 3.9%, respectively. At 12 months, they were 7.63 ± 4.3 kg, 16.9 ± 11.1%, and 6.6 ± 5.0%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that all outcomes were significantly higher in the group with FT suturing combined with argon plasma coagulation (APC) (p < 0.0001). Meta-analysis included 15 FT studies and showed greater results. Three studies described superficial-thickness suturing with pooled AWL of 3.0 ± 3.8, 4.4 ± 0.07, and 3.7 ± 7.4 kg at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Two articles described APC alone with mean AWL of 15.4 ± 2.0 and 15.4 ± 9.1 kg at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Full-thickness suturing is effective at treating weight regain after RYGB. Performing APC prior to suturing seems to result in greater weight loss. Head-to-head studies are needed to confirm our results. Few studies adequately assess effectiveness of other endoscopic techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 276
页数:10
相关论文
共 270 条
[1]  
Vilar-Gomez E(2015)Weight loss through lifestyle modification significantly reduces features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Gastroenterology 149 367-378
[2]  
Martinez-Perez Y(2015)Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013 Obes Surg 25 1822-1832
[3]  
Calzadilla-Bertot L(2016)10-year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Ann Surg 264 121-126
[4]  
Angrisani L(2016)Long-term outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10- to 13-year data Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg 12 11-20
[5]  
Santonicola A(2004)Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group: lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery N Engl J Med 351 2683-2693
[6]  
Iovino P(2016)Endoscopy after bariatric surgery Ann Gastroenterol: Q Publ Hell Soc Gastroenterol 29 249-257
[7]  
Formisano G(2011)Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9 228-233
[8]  
Buchwald H(2011)Endoscopic findings and outcomes of revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after gastric bypass Surg Endosc 25 3345-3352
[9]  
Scopinaro N(2016)Gastrojejunal anastomotic reduction for weight regain in Roux-en-y gastric bypass patients: physiological, behavioral, and anatomical effects of endoscopic suturing and sclerotherapy Surg Obes Relat Dis 12 1810-1816
[10]  
Mehaffey JH(2016)Re-operations after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review Obes Surg 26 2237-2247