Approaches for integrated assessment of ecological and eutrophication status of surface waters in Nordic Countries

被引:0
作者
Jesper H. Andersen
Jukka Aroviita
Jacob Carstensen
Nikolai Friberg
Richard K. Johnson
Pirkko Kauppila
Mats Lindegarth
Ciarán Murray
Karl Norling
机构
[1] NIVA Denmark Water Research,Department of Bioscience
[2] Freshwater Centre,Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment
[3] Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE),Department of Biological and Environmental Science
[4] Aarhus University, Tjärnö
[5] Norwegian Institute for Water Research,Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences
[6] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,undefined
[7] Marine Research Center,undefined
[8] Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE),undefined
[9] University of Gothenburg,undefined
[10] University of Gothenburg,undefined
来源
Ambio | 2016年 / 45卷
关键词
Ecological status; Water Framework Directive; Biological quality elements; Coastal eutrophication; Integration; Assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We review approaches and tools currently used in Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) for integrated assessment of ‘ecological status’ sensu the EU Water Framework Directive as well as assessment of ‘eutrophication status’ in coastal and marine waters. Integration principles for combining indicators within biological quality elements (BQEs) and combining BQEs into a final-integrated assessment are discussed. Specific focus has been put on combining different types of information into indices, since several methods are currently employed. As a consequence of the variety of methods used, comparisons across both BQEs and water categories (river, lakes and coastal waters) can be difficult. Based on our analyses, we conclude that some principles and methods for integration can be critical and that a harmonised approach should be developed. Further, we conclude that the integration principles applied within BQEs are critical and in need of harmonisation if we want a better understanding of potential transition in ecological status between surface water types, e.g. when riverine water enters a downstream lake or coastal water body.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 691
页数:10
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]  
Alahuhta J(2009)Defining the ecological status of small forest lakes using multiple biological quality elements and paleolimnological analysis Fundamental and Applied Limnology 175 203-216
[2]  
Vuori K-M(2010)A simple method for confidence rating of eutrophication status assessments Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 919-924
[3]  
Hellsten S(2011)Getting the measure of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea: towards improved assessment principles and methods Biogeochemistry 106 137-156
[4]  
Järvinen M(1983)The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-waters Water Research 17 333-347
[5]  
Olin M(2008)A priori typology-based prediction of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna for ecological classification of rivers Environmental Management 42 894-906
[6]  
Rask M(2012)Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive Ecological Indicators 18 31-41
[7]  
Palomäki A(2000)Distribution and maximum depth of Fucus vesiculosus along the Finnish coastline Marine Biology 136 303-307
[8]  
Korhonen PK(2010)Problems associated with the the ‘one-out, all-out’ principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 1143-1146
[9]  
Andersen JH(2009)Using multiple ecosystem components, in assessing ecological status in Spanish (Basque Country) Atlantic marine waters Marine Pollution Bulletin 59 54-64
[10]  
Murray C(2014)Tales from a thousand and one way to integrate marine biodiversity components when assessing the environmental status Frontiers in Marine Science 39 577-592