CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao-Zhu Lin
Haruhiko Machida
Isao Tanaka RT
Rika Fukui RT
Eiko Ueno
Ke-Min Chen
Fu-Hua Yan
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Department of Radiology Ruijin Hospital
[2] Tokyo Women’s Medical University Medical Center East,Department of Radiology
来源
Abdominal Imaging | 2014年 / 39卷
关键词
Pancreas; Computed tomography; Iterative reconstruction; Image quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to compare CT images of the pancreas reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR), and filtered back projection (FBP) techniques for image quality and pancreatic duct (PD) depiction. Data from 40 patients with contrast-enhanced abdominal CT [CTDIvol: 10.3 ± 3.0 (mGy)] during the late arterial phase were reconstructed with FBP, 40% ASiR–FBP blending, and MBIR. Two radiologists assessed the depiction of the main PD, image noise, and overall image quality using 5-point scale independently. Objective CT value and noise were measured in the pancreatic parenchyma, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the PD was calculated. The Friedman test and post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni test following one-way ANOVA were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment, respectively. For the subjective assessment, scores for MBIR were significantly higher than those for FBP and 40% ASiR (all P < 0.001). No significant differences in CT values of the pancreatic parenchyma were noted among FBP, 40% ASiR, and MBIR images (P > 0.05). Objective image noise was significantly lower and CNR of the PD was higher with MBIR than with FBP and 40% ASiR (all P < 0.05). Our results suggest that pancreatic CT images reconstructed with MBIR have lower image noise, better image quality, and higher conspicuity and CNR of the PD compared with FBP and ASiR.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 505
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques
    Lin, Xiao-Zhu
    Machida, Haruhiko
    Tanaka, Isao
    Fukui, Rika
    Ueno, Eiko
    Chen, Ke-Min
    Yan, Fu-Hua
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2014, 39 (03): : 497 - 505
  • [2] Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp
    Kim, Jin Hyeok
    Choo, Ki Seok
    Moon, Tae Yong
    Lee, Jun Woo
    Jeon, Ung Bae
    Kim, Tae Un
    Hwang, Jae Yeon
    Yun, Myeong-Ja
    Jeong, Dong Wook
    Lim, Soo Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (07) : 2055 - 2063
  • [3] Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp
    Jin Hyeok Kim
    Ki Seok Choo
    Tae Yong Moon
    Jun Woo Lee
    Ung Bae Jeon
    Tae Un Kim
    Jae Yeon Hwang
    Myeong-Ja Yun
    Dong Wook Jeong
    Soo Jin Lim
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 2055 - 2063
  • [4] Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
    Son, Sung Sil
    Choo, Ki Seok
    Jeon, Ung Bae
    Jeon, Gye Rok
    Nam, Kyung Jin
    Kim, Tae Un
    Yeom, Jeong A.
    Hwang, Jae Yeon
    Jeong, Dong Wook
    Lim, Soo Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 31 : 31 - 38
  • [5] Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
    Sung Sil Son
    Ki Seok Choo
    Ung Bae Jeon
    Gye Rok Jeon
    Kyung Jin Nam
    Tae Un Kim
    Jeong A Yeom
    Jae Yeon Hwang
    Dong Wook Jeong
    Soo Jin Lim
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2015, 31 : 31 - 38
  • [6] Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in brain CT
    Ren, Qingguo
    Dewan, Sheilesh Kumar
    Li, Ming
    Li, Jianying
    Mao, Dingbiao
    Wang, Zhenglei
    Hua, Yanqing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (10) : 2597 - 2601
  • [7] Abdominal CT: Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    Hsieh, Jiang
    Licato, Paul E.
    Do, Synho
    Pien, Homer H.
    Blake, Michael A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (02) : 373 - 383
  • [8] Comparison of image quality between filtered back-projection and the adaptive statistical and novel model-based iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT for renal calculi
    Vardhanabhuti V.
    Ilyas S.
    Gutteridge C.
    Freeman S.J.
    Roobottom C.A.
    Insights into Imaging, 2013, 4 (5) : 661 - 669
  • [9] Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and a Model-based Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT: An Experimental Clinical Study
    Deak, Zsuzsanna
    Grimm, Jochen M.
    Treitl, Marcus
    Geyer, Lucas L.
    Linsenmaier, Ulrich
    Koerner, Markus
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Wirth, Stefan
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 197 - 206
  • [10] Comparison of image quality from filtered back projection, statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in abdominal computed tomography
    Kuo, Yu
    Lin, Yi-Yang
    Lee, Rheun-Chuan
    Lin, Chung-Jung
    Chiou, Yi-You
    Guo, Wan-Yuo
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (31)