Research insights: perceived differences about teaching and assessment practices in religious education

被引:0
作者
Antonella Poncini
机构
[1] The University of Notre Dame Australia,School of Education
来源
Journal of Religious Education | 2021年 / 69卷
关键词
Religious education; Accountability; Large-scale standardised assessments; Policy expectations; School-based practices; Professional formation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses educational insights drawn from a mixed-methods study in Religious Education (RE). The study involved 238 teachers and school leaders, working in 65 Catholic schools in Western Australia (WA). The focus of the study was the educators’ perceptions of a large-scale, standardised assessment (LSA) called The Bishops’ Religious Literacy Assessment (BRLA). The assessment is developed by the Catholic Education Office in WA for the purpose of measuring student learning in RE. Students enrolled in Years Three, Five and Nine in Catholic schools across WA participate in the assessment each year in August. The study revealed six themes, two of which are specific to the educators’ perceptions of the administration of the BRLA. The other four themes relate to the perceived nature and role of RE and the use of LSAs in education. The themes signal complexity, based on diverse experiences about teaching and assessment practices in RE. These experiences provide empirical evidence specific to the context of RE as an academic learning area, reserved for the classroom. The evidence is new knowledge that builds on research in RE, identifying existing complexity and challenging, presuppositions and motivations that appear to cause misalignment between policy expectations and school-based practices. Given national interest in education about progressing student learning and the Catholic education agenda about addressing the quality of RE, the new knowledge acts as a springboard for classroom, school and system level dialogue about teaching and assessment practices in RE that can promote progress in student learning in Catholic schools.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 56
页数:19
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Convey JJ(2012)Perceptions of Catholic identity: Views of Catholic school administrators and teachers Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice 16 187-214
[2]  
Forster M(2009)Assessment: The heart of effective practice Professional Educator 8 11-14
[3]  
Hackett C(2010)The role of experiential content knowledge in the formation of beginning RE teachers Journal of Religious Education 58 38-49
[4]  
Healy H(2010)Moderation: Making learning a priority in primary religious education Journal of Religious Education 58 29-37
[5]  
Bush H(2004)Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come Educational Researcher 33 14-26
[6]  
Johnson RB(2008)Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studied Review of Educational Research 78 608-644
[7]  
Onwuegbuzie AJ(2013)Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: commensurate global and national developments Journal of Education Policy 28 539-556
[8]  
Lee J(2005)On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 357-387
[9]  
Lingard B(2010)From data-informed to data-led? School leadership within the context of external testing Leading & Managing 16 90-107
[10]  
Martino W(2011)Catechesis and religious education in Canadian Catholic schools Religious Education 106 537-549