Acute Kidney Injury in Trauma Patients Admitted to Critical Care: Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Prediction Model

被引:0
作者
Ryan W. Haines
Shih-Pin Lin
Russell Hewson
Christopher J. Kirwan
Hew D. Torrance
Michael J. O’Dwyer
Anita West
Karim Brohi
Rupert M. Pearse
Parjam Zolfaghari
John R. Prowle
机构
[1] The Royal London Hospital,Adult Critical Care Unit
[2] Barts Health NHS Trust,William Harvey Research Institute
[3] Queen Mary University of London,Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine
[4] National Yang-Ming University,Division of Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health
[5] National Taiwan University,Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute
[6] Queen Mary University of London,Department of Renal Medicine and Transplantation
[7] The Royal London Hospital,undefined
[8] Barts Health NHS Trust,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) complicating major trauma is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Traumatic AKI has specific risk factors and predictable time-course facilitating diagnostic modelling. In a single centre, retrospective observational study we developed risk prediction models for AKI after trauma based on data around intensive care admission. Models predicting AKI were developed using data from 830 patients, using data reduction followed by logistic regression, and were independently validated in a further 564 patients. AKI occurred in 163/830 (19.6%) with 42 (5.1%) receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT). First serum creatinine and phosphate, units of blood transfused in first 24 h, age and Charlson score discriminated need for RRT and AKI early after trauma. For RRT c-statistics were good to excellent: development: 0.92 (0.88–0.96), validation: 0.91 (0.86–0.97). Modelling AKI stage 2–3, c-statistics were also good, development: 0.81 (0.75–0.88) and validation: 0.83 (0.74–0.92). The model predicting AKI stage 1–3 performed moderately, development: c-statistic 0.77 (0.72–0.81), validation: 0.70 (0.64–0.77). Despite good discrimination of need for RRT, positive predictive values (PPV) at the optimal cut-off were only 23.0% (13.7–42.7) in development. However, PPV for the alternative endpoint of RRT and/or death improved to 41.2% (34.8–48.1) highlighting death as a clinically relevant endpoint to RRT.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Bagshaw SM(2008)A multi-center evaluation of early acute kidney injury in critically ill trauma patients Ren Fail 30 581-589
[2]  
George C(2015)Acute kidney injury following severe trauma: Risk factors and long-term outcome J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79 407-412
[3]  
Gibney RT(2012)Haemorrhage control in severely injured patients Lancet 380 1099-1108
[4]  
Bellomo R(2011)Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis Lancet 377 2093-2102
[5]  
Eriksson M(2013)Acute kidney injury is associated with early cytokine changes after trauma J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74 1005-1013
[6]  
Brattstrom O(2014)The systemic immune response to trauma: an overview of pathophysiology and treatment Lancet 384 1455-1465
[7]  
Martensson J(2016)Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Injured Combat Veterans: A Retrospective Cohort Study Am J Kidney Dis 68 564-570
[8]  
Larsson E(2014)The incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury amongst patients admitted to a level I trauma unit Injury 45 259-264
[9]  
Oldner A(2009)Comparison of injury severity between AIS 2005 and AIS 1990 in a large injury database Ann Adv Automot Med 53 83-89
[10]  
Gruen RL(2005)Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data Med Care 43 1130-1139