Poppers and PrEP: Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Inhaled Nitrites

被引:0
作者
H. Rhodes Hambrick
Su Hyun Park
John A. Schneider
Kenneth H. Mayer
Adam W. Carrico
Scott E. Sherman
Dustin T. Duncan
机构
[1] New York University School of Medicine,Spatial Epidemiology Lab, Department of Population Health
[2] University of Chicago School of Medicine,Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences
[3] and Chicago Center for HIV Elimination,Departments of Medicine and Global Health and Population
[4] Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health,Department of Public Health Sciences
[5] and Fenway Health,Department of Population Health, Spatial Epidemiology Lab
[6] Univeristy of Miami,undefined
[7] New York University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
AIDS and Behavior | 2018年 / 22卷
关键词
HIV prevention; Men who have sex with men; Poppers; Inhaled nitrites; PrEP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Men who have sex with men (MSM) commonly use inhaled nitrites, or poppers, though their use is a risk factor HIV seroconversion. Pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, is effective for HIV prevention, but is not widely used, and little is known regarding PrEP use and acceptability among MSM who use inhaled nitrites. We surveyed 580 MSM in Paris, France in 2016 about popper use, sexual behaviors including condomless anal intercourse (CAI), serosorting, and sexual positioning, PrEP use, PrEP candidacy, and interest in alternate PrEP delivery modalities. We included 444 HIV negative participants for the current study. 46.2% reported popper use in the prior 3 months. Using multivariate adjusted logistic regression, we found that popper users were more likely than non-users to consider themselves candidates for PrEP [adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) = 2.73; 95% CI 1.54–4.83], but they were not more likely to be current (aRRR = 1.54; 95% CI 0.71–3.33) or past (aRRR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.44–4.28) PrEP users. Mediation analyses indicated that increased CAI and serosorting partly explained the relationship between popper use and PrEP candidacy. There was considerable interest in alternate proposed PrEP delivery modalities, particularly long-acting injectable PrEP [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.43; 95% CI 1.15–1.79].
引用
收藏
页码:3658 / 3672
页数:14
相关论文
共 256 条
[31]  
Hankins C(2000)The behavioral model for vulnerable populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people Health Serv Res 34 1273-150
[32]  
Calabrese SK(1995)Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36 1-1597
[33]  
Underhill K(2004)A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data Am J Epidemiol 159 702-1267
[34]  
Grant RM(2011)Performance of the modified Poisson regression approach for estimating relative risks from clustered prospective data Am J Epidemiol 174 984-292
[35]  
Anderson PL(2013)Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediatior interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and impelementation with SAS and SPSS macros Psychol Methods 18 137-1349
[36]  
McMahan V(2015)Applying a PrEP continuum of care for men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia Clin Infect Dis 61 1590-1399
[37]  
Liu AY(2017)PrEP awareness, familiarity, comfort, and prescribing experience among US primary care providers and HIV specialists AIDS Behav 21 1256-3298
[38]  
Amico KR(2017)Uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a national cohort of gay and bisexual men in the United States J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 74 285-1335
[39]  
Mehrota M(2017)Expanding the menu of HIV prevention options: a qualitative study of experiences with long-acting injectable cabotegravir as PrEP in the context of a phase II trial in the United States AIDS Behav 21 1336-216
[40]  
Crosby RA(2017)Preferences for long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), daily oral PrEP, or condoms for HIV prevention among U.S. men who have sex with men AIDS Behav 12 e0183521-474