Lessons on the relationship between livestock husbandry and biodiversity from the Kenya Long-term Exclosure Experiment (KLEE)

被引:67
作者
Corinna Riginos
Lauren M Porensky
Kari E Veblen
Wilfred O Odadi
Ryan L Sensenig
Duncan Kimuyu
Felicia Keesing
Marit L Wilkerson
Truman P Young
机构
[1] Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, 82071, WY
[2] Mpala Research Centre, P.O. Box 555, Nanyuki
[3] Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, 95616, CA
[4] Wildland Resources Department, Utah State University, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, 84322, UT
[5] Department of Biology, Goshen College, Goshen, 46526, IN
[6] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi
[7] Department of Biology, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, 12504, NY
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Boma; Compatibility; Competition; Encroachment; Fire; Kraal; Landscape;
D O I
10.1186/2041-7136-2-10
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although livestock and wildlife share most of their ranges worldwide, little controlled experimental research has been done on their interactions. Since 1995 we have been manipulating the presence of cattle and large wild ungulates in a Kenyan savanna rangeland in order to better understand the nature of competition and coexistence between these two guilds of herbivores and how they affect biodiversity. In a replicated experiment in which different combinations of cattle and wild herbivores are allowed access to large-scale plots, we have been monitoring the impacts of these herbivores on vegetation, on the wild herbivores, and cattle themselves, and on a variety of other taxa. We have also been conducting experimental research to examine other ways in which livestock management in eastern Africa might affect biodiversity. These include studies on the impacts of fire, livestock corrals, and changes in tree density. This research has revealed the following patterns. (1) Cattle suppress many species of wild herbivores, presumably through competition for their shared resources. The nature of this competition, however, is contingent on rainfall and the presence of other herbivores. (2) Wild herbivores both compete with and facilitate cattle, depending on rainfall. (3) The pastoral practice of housing livestock nightly in protective corral enclosures (“bomas”) over time produces long-lived nutrient hotspots preferred by both livestock and wild herbivores. (4) Fire, frequently used by pastoralists in the past, is valuable for improving grass quality, with benefits for many species of wild herbivores. (5) Pastoral practices that reduce woody cover, including burning and boma construction, create local habitat patches that are preferred by wild herbivores, apparently for their greater anti-predator visibility. (6) Despite competition between livestock and wild herbivores, coexistence between these two guilds can be managed, and there are several positive (facilitative) pathways between livestock husbandry and wild herbivores and other biodiversity. © 2012, Riginos et al.; licensee Springer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 91 条
[11]  
Large herbivores alter edge effects around ecosystem hotspots in an African savanna
[12]  
BurnSilver S.B., Worden J., Boone R.B., Processes of fragmentation in the Amboseli ecosystem, southern Kajiado District, Kenya, Fragmentation in semi-arid and arid landscapes: Consequences for human and natural systems, pp. 225-253, (2008)
[13]  
Dunham K.M., Robertson E.F., Swanepoel C.M., Population decline of tsessebe antelope (Damaliscus lunatus lunatus) on a mixed cattle and wildlife ranch in Zimbabwe, Biological Conservation, 113, pp. 111-124, (2003)
[14]  
Duncan P., Foose T.J., Gordon I., Gakahu C.G., Lloyd M., Comparative nutrient extraction from forages by grazing bovids and equids: A test of the nutritional model of equid/bovid competition and coexistence, Oecologia, 84, pp. 411-418, (1990)
[15]  
Toit J., Kock J., Deutsch J., Wild rangelands: Conserving wildlife while maintaining livestock in semi-arid ecosystems, (2010)
[16]  
Ensminger J., Rutten A., The political-economy of changing property-rights—dismantling a pastoral commons, American Ethnologist, 18, pp. 683-699, (1991)
[17]  
Estes R.D., Atwood J.L., Estes A.B., Downward trends in Ngorongoro Crater ungulate populations 1986–2005: Conservation concerns and the need for ecological research, Biological Conservation, 131, pp. 106-120, (2006)
[18]  
Fratkin E.M., Roth E.A., Nathan M.A., When nomads settle: The effects of commoditization, nutritional change, and formal education on Ariaal and Rendille pastoralists, Current Anthropology, 40, pp. 729-735, (1999)
[19]  
Georgiadis N.J., Olwero J.G.N., Ojwang G., Romanach S.S., Savanna herbivore dynamics in a livestock-dominated landscape: I. Dependence on land use rainfall density and time, Biological Conservation, 137, pp. 461-472, (2007)
[20]  
Georgiadis N.J., Introduction: Conserving wildlife in Kenya’s Ewaso landscape, Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 632, pp. 1-10, (2011)